|
A
MAN FOR ALL SEASONS
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 4 out of 5 Because
of: brief strong language
Rated:
I have heard a
great deal about this film over the years, since it has impacted so many
of the young lives that have watched it. People still talk about what a
difference it made in their moral standards all these years later, after
being "forced" to watch it in history class. I suppose then, I
went in with high expectations and to a certain extent, they were
fulfilled. It's not an adventurous film, just a simple one about an
extraordinary man of faith.
Set in the turbulent
reign of Henry VIII, the story follows the convictions of Sir Thomas More
(Paul Scofield), an idealist and close friend of His Majesty. Having
mentored the king for many years, Thomas is firmly installed at court and
oversees many of the judicial cases. He is known for being morally stable
and unshakable in his Catholic faith. An author and devout family man,
Thomas encourages the aspiring young souls clambering for a place at court
to pursue their passions elsewhere, knowing that the court is a moral
quagmire for anyone without a firm conscience and source of guidance. His
staunch ideals prevent him from approving of the king's romance with the
spirited Anne Boleyn (Vanessa Redgrave). Anne has refused to sleep with
the king until their marriage is arranged, which makes Henry all the more
eager to be rid of his wife Katherine. He puts the pressure on the
ambitious Cardinal Wolsey (Orson Welles) to convince all the religious
authorities of the court to agree to an annulment on the basis that his
marriage to Katherine is a farce.
Because
Katherine is a woman of faith, and her marriage was blessed by the Pope in
Rome, More refuses to join the league of others who are willing to throw
her aside in favor of the king's whim. This allows his enemies at court to
scheme against him. If he would but remain silent about his convictions
and sign over his loyalty to Henry, who has firmly decided to establish a
Protestant church in England in order to have his divorce, More would not
be accused of treason. Thomas Cromwell (Leo McKern) and Richard Rich (John
Hurt) have reason to silence him, but despite the pleading of his family
and friends, the orders of the king, and his own sense of self
preservation, Thomas remains unbending and defiant, and writes himself
into martyrdom. The result is a very studious exploration of standing up
for what you believe, despite the dangers.
There are many
excellent lessons in the film, which is based on an award-winning play by
Robert Bolt, and managed to capture an Oscar for Best Picture. More is a
devout man who stands by his convictions, even when it would suit him to
change his mind and conform to the desires of those around him. If nothing
else, it will teach you the importance of being willing to die for your
faith, since that is really what comes into central focus as the story
moves on. It's not so much about divorce as Henry slandering More's
beliefs, and in that sense, I'm rather sorry they did not pursue that
aspect further. More did not die because he refused to acknowledge Anne as
queen so much as he refused to agree that the temperamental, self-serving,
lustful Henry should be the head of the new Protestant church. It is
interesting to see the events of Protestantism through his eyes, and it
takes more than a few jabs in the long run, but it's worth it.
My
only complaint is that the film seems rather over-long and moves quite
slowly at times. There were many excellent scenes, such as Thomas speaking
with the boatman on the river, and his wife pleading with him to change
his mind and sign the documents, or even Henry railing against him in the
garden. But in the end, I was checking my watch a bit simply because the
plot was starting to wear into melodrama. It is a good production, and
everyone should see it at some point, but it could have been improved with
a little more action. That being said, there's nothing really wrong with
it aside from a handful of religious profanities. Jesus' name is abused a
couple of times, and God d*** is said once or twice. "Hell" and
"damnation" are also used in a religious context.
The casting
was quite good. Henry came across as a spoiled brat, which history pretty
much tells us he was, while More was a much more mature, resolved man. I
was also delighted to see Wendy Hiller play More's wife, as I had never
seen her quite so young before. Audiences might also be tickled to know
that Redgrave played Mary, Queen of
Scots only a few years later.
|