|
CITY
OF ANGELS
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: sexual content, anti-religious elements
Rated:
I'm
not going to try and explain how theologically wrong this film is.
I'm just going to treat it as a piece of art. This is a movie in
which angels are given the choice to "fall" to earth and
become human if they so wish. There's no going back. Very few
angels have ever done it. And their reasons for doing so are
generally because they've fallen in love. If this derails you, you
may as well stop now. Otherwise, it's a touching film.
Seth
(Nicholas Cage) is an angel. He was spoken into existence before the creation of
time itself. He has been in the presence of God, and gathers with
all other angels at sunrise and sunset, to hear the voice of God
in the golden light as it breaks over the horizon. Having never
been human, he has never been able to feel the depth of human
emotion: pain, fear, sorrow, love. Present in times of great
sorrow and overwhelming joy, Seth desires to know more about
mankind and the wonderful creation of free will. This leads him to
Maggie (Meg Ryan). A
successful surgeon who doubts the existence of a higher power,
Maggie Rice is a self-confident, beautiful woman whose life is
about to be shaken to its very core. After a successful operation
with very little danger involved, her patient goes into cardiac
arrest and dies. There's nothing she can do, but watch his heart
stop within her fingertips. It is in that moment that she begins
to realize that she does not control who lives or dies, but
Someone else. Someone she has been running from for a long time.
Severely
shaken, Maggie doubts her own ability to heal. But then she meets
Seth, a handsome stranger who comes and goes with the wind. His
words are always full of encouragement. But even as she searches
to find herself and some meaning in her life, Seth discovers that
he is falling in love. Distraught, he seeks out the advice of one
who has taken the leap from angel to human. Nathaniel tells him
that all one need do is will himself to a life as a human being,
and fall from some high place. But
this choice has its consequences: human frailty, fear, sorrow,
pain... rejection. And he can never turn back.
Exquisitely
filmed and with a memorable soundtrack, City of Angels has
a profoundly moving charm despite its obvious flaws. The Bible
tells us that angels cannot become human. In fact, the only angels
ever to 'love' humans were cast from heaven. But the film did, at
least, get some parts of the truth right. Angels are everywhere,
all around us. They are guardians, protectors, defenders. They
lead people to heaven after death, and encourage them in life.
Dividing from tradition, these angels are all dressed in black. It
makes a commanding statement; their presence is suddenly profound.
To see them gathered on the shore, listening wholeheartedly to the
song of the dawn, is moving.
With
all its beauty, the film is flawed. It moves too slowly and is
about a half hour too long. Profanity becomes a minor problem,
along with nudity and implied sex. The
scene is fairly lengthy and intense and involves suggestive
dialogue as well as panning their upper bodies. I'd suggest
fast-forwarding through if you should ever decide to see the film.
(You'll have plenty of warning.) We see backside nudity as a man
goes skinny dipping and again later, brief side nudity (no
details) as a man showers. Maggie lives on and off with her
boyfriend; they're shown snuggling a few times. While
still an angel, Seth crawls into bed with Maggie and holds her
until she falls asleep. (The single touching element about this is
that it is divine grace that gives her rest; she never has slept
completely through the night.)
Jesus' name is abused at least four
times, along with other profanities and suggestive dialogue.
Violent content is kept to a minimum, although some thugs beat up
a character and steal his shoes. Discovering that Seth cannot be
wounded or even bleed, Maggie attempts to cut him several times. I
am of the belief that all truth comes from God, and there is some
element of truth in all things. For me, City of Angels was
a forgivable film that didn't disturb me as greatly as I thought
it would. It seems almost blasphemous to entertain oneself with a
film in which an angel falls in love with a human, and gives up
his immortality to be with her. Yet somehow, on some deep level,
this film touched me. That's quite an accomplishment.
|