|
DR.
DOLITTLE 2
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5 Because
of: crude humor, sexual references
Rated:
With the first
Dr. Dolittle a big hit at our house, I wasn't quite certain what to
expect from the sequel, but it turns out it's a lot less funny and a
little more politically correct than its highly successful predecessor.
It's not bad by any means but does rely somewhat on crude humor and overly
sentimental liberal opinions in order to make its point.
It's been
several years since John Dolittle (Eddie Murphy) discovered her can speak
with animals, and since then he has become world renowned as a specialist
in diagnosing and assisting animals in solving their medical and emotional
problems. Whether it is teaching two sea turtles to love one another again
or asking the family dog to let him in the house after he's misplaced his
keys again, John is hot stuff in the press. His face is plastered all over
magazine covers, and he has been abroad so often that his wife (Kristen
Wilson) has almost forgotten what he looks like. Returning after one long
trip overseas, John discovers that a lot has changed in his absence. For
one thing, his eldest daughter Charisse (Raven) has started dating and is
beginning to rebel against parental authority. You know it's bad when her
mother has to send her a text message rather than knock on her bedroom
door to inform her when dinner is on the table.
While
John attempts to maintain authority in his household, he is approached by
a local Beaver who wants him to figure out a way to prevent the logging
companies from destroying the local forest. The only means of doing that
is to see to it that a local bear is found a mate of her own kind, in
order to produce cubs that would necessitate the wood being turned into a
protected habitat for an endangered species. The only other bear of her
kind lives in captivity and is willing to give it a shot, but he's a
circus performer and not about to impress the local wildlife, so John must
work to transform him into a "wild" bear before his deadline.
There is some
humor to be found in this film, but the underlining message that all
lumber companies are intent on destroying natural wildlife is offensive.
The CEO's of these companies are your typical stereotyped trigger-happy
money-grubbing Republicans with walls covered in stuffed animal heads and
an attitude that anyone can be bought off with money. That kind of sours
the entire experience, and plants erroneous ideas in youngsters heads. Why
is selective logging never depicted in these films? Because that is what a
number of lumber companies do, in order to preserve and protect the
forests. If you leave forests to become overgrown and overly crowded,
mother nature often burns them completely to the ground in order to start
again. Apart from that, however, the film is not overly offensive but does
rely a little too heavily on bathroom humor and innuendo.
John
gets shut in a public toilet with the bear, which suddenly "needs to
go." The implications are that the result was nasty. His dog, in the
meanwhile, tries to flirt up a wolf but is undercut by her mate, whose
urine is used to mark over the dog's territory. The sexual practices of
animals are discussed a handful of times. An early shot has John
encouraging a turtle to mount his mate; later on, he tries to give the
bears tips on romance, and dialogue revolves around their encounters. John
and his wife get cuddly only to find they are being observed by all the
woodland creatures. Birds bombard the bad guys with feces.
There is a
touching scene of reconciliation between John and Charisse that almost
makes it worth it, in which she confides why she has been pulling away
from her parents so much, and John realizes that his fame has caused him
to become something of an absentee father. It's not a bad film but the
political agenda depicted in it was rather tiresome and the script was
lean on good laughs. Still, it's a lot better than most of the stuff aimed
at kids these days, so for discerning parents it may be worth a watch.
|