Contrary
to what the title might imply, this is not a retelling of the
classic fairy tale. Instead, it is a historical spoof on
"what if" Napoleon Bonaparte had actually escaped from
his island prison. Based on a novel by Simon Leys, the story is
rather slow moving but is ultimately satisfying. It's a clever
idea with an excellent cast, including Ian Holm (Lord of the
Ring's Bilbo Baggins) in the lead, playing both Napoleon and his
look-alike imposter.
The
time is after the fall of Napoleon's armies at the battle of
Waterloo and the once-great emperor is now imprisoned on a
British-governed island, unhappy with his life, warily wishing he
might once more enter France, and having to deal with his fellow
prisoners of war -- his generals. Josephine is of course gone, and
Napoleon's son has been "seduced" with the wealth and
riches offered to a young man of his upstanding character. As a
result, the emperor is now alone. He longs for the battle glory
which once covered him and with the aid of his closest friends and
allies, comes up with a brilliant scheme. They will find a
look-alike to impersonate him, and he will be smuggled into Paris,
where the imposter will reveal himself and the French people will
rise up for their newly returned monarch.

Congratulating
himself on the brilliance of this scheme, his proposed imposter is
brought forth -- a lowly man of no background or breeding, who has
long served as a scrub man on a ship. Once Napoleon dons his
impoverished identity, the emperor discovers life as a lowly cad
is not as easy as he once believed. Forced to do without being
pampered, bowed to, or flattered with insincere attentions, his
plans go wrong. The ship does not put in at France, but instead
continues on to another port. From there he must work his way to
Paris, taking the common coach (full of all sorts of displeasing
people), and pass the battlefield at Waterloo, which was his
greatest disgrace. He begins to learn that the name of "Napoleon"
is either worshiped or scorned.
People
whom he has never known claim to have been great allies of the
former emperor. Others spit at the mention of his name. He reaches
Paris under some duress and is sent to the home of someone who can
help him until the imposter reveals his true identity. What Napoleon
finds instead is that the poor wretch is dead, leaving a widow and
adopted child in financial duress. They remain in the care of Dr.
Lambert, a local medical practitioner who makes his meager earning
by tending the ill among Paris' lower quarters. Nichole
"Pumpkin" Truchaut at first mistrusts the guest she
unwillingly takes under her roof, but slowly comes to respect him.
There is a certain sense of empowerment about this aging man; he
can lift the spirits of those around him with rousing speeches and
well-executed "battle plans."
Dr.
Lambert, both out of jealousy on the part of Pumpkin's affection
for her newfound friend and houseguest, and suspicion toward the
man's uncanny likeness to Bonaparte, seeks to drive them apart --
or prove the man mad. In the meantime, Napoleon grows tired of his
charade, but can do nothing until his counterpart Eugene Lenormand
reveals himself. As for Eugene? He's enjoying writing
"his" racy memoirs, being petted and pampered, and
scorning at the lower classes far too much to even consider
telling the truth. His word reigns supreme on the island, and
anyone who dares speak a whisper against him is promptly carted
off as a "lunatic."
As
you can imagine, what unfolds is hilarity mixed with a good blend
of satire and a few meager twists. The film relies more on the
charisma of its actors and the unusual storyline to please, rather
than going in for a lot of action or plot twists. We all know what
will happen in the end, but the point is enjoying ourselves while
getting there. In this means, The Emperor's New Clothes
does please the viewer to a certain degree, though it embraces a
few ideals and morals I wasn't overly excited with. The real
pleasure is the chemistry between Ian Holm and Iben Hjejle, who
plays Pumpkin. Though the movie seems a little strange in its
pursuit of a romance between two people of such vastly different
ages, Holm's Napoleon is so likable you think little of it, much
like Colonel Brandon and Marianne in Sense
& Sensibility.
Unlike
the latter film, this one is set in France. I'm sure you know to
what I allude; marriage comes later, if at all. The film is rated
only PG and not even for mild sensuality. But there are several
scenes where Pumpkin and Napoleon are shown curled up in the same
bed; it's implied they go on living together. There's no other
sensuality aside from a "racy" passage a bookshop owner
reads from the "fake" Napoleon's memoirs. (We hear part
of this passage dictated earlier in the script.) It references Napoleon's
"seduction" of the Polish princess, but isn't terribly
bawdy. There are several chest-up shots of Ian Holm bathing but
nothing explicit. The rating comes from brief mind language -- one
d*mn, one mild abuse of deity, and one anatomical reference.
(Though I have to admit, in its context due to what happens next,
it's hilarious rather than offensive.) There is also some bathroom
humor; one man farts and complains of bowl problems; another
doctor talks briefly about digestive tracts, and we hear Napoleon
urinating on a tree.
No
movie is perfect, but some of the brighter aspects of this film
make up for flaws. The torment Napoleon endures when he discovers
what his name truly means -- that hundreds of men have gone mad
under the delusion that they are Napoleon. His success in turning
Pumpkin's fruit stand into a thriving and prosperous neighborhood
business. When they first sit together on the roof and watch an
incoming storm. There are some unexplained mysteries, but the film
is fairly family-friendly and comical enough to warrant a few
laughs. Ian Holm turns in a beautiful performance, although -- and
I hate to admit this, but... he'll always be a hobbit to me.