Contrary to what the title might imply, this is not a retelling
of the classic fairy tale. Instead, it is a historical spoof on
"what if" Napoleon Bonaparte had actually escaped from his
island prison. Based on a novel by Simon Leys, the story is
rather slow moving but is ultimately satisfying. It's a clever
idea with an excellent cast, including Ian Holm (Lord of the
Ring's Bilbo Baggins) in the lead, playing both Napoleon and
his look-alike imposter.
The time is after the fall of Napoleon's armies at the battle of
Waterloo and the once-great emperor is now imprisoned on a
British-governed island, unhappy with his life, warily wishing
he might once more enter France, and having to deal with his
fellow prisoners of war -- his generals. Josephine is of course
gone, and Napoleon's son has been "seduced" with the wealth and
riches offered to a young man of his upstanding character. As a
result, the emperor is now alone. He longs for the battle glory
which once covered him and with the aid of his closest friends
and allies, comes up with a brilliant scheme. They will find a
look-alike to impersonate him, and he will be smuggled into
Paris, where the imposter will reveal himself and the French
people will rise up for their newly returned monarch.
Congratulating himself on the brilliance of this scheme, his
proposed imposter is brought forth -- a lowly man of no
background or breeding, who has long served as a scrub man on a
ship. Once Napoleon dons his impoverished identity, the emperor
discovers life as a lowly cad is not as easy as he once
believed. Forced to do without being pampered, bowed to, or
flattered with insincere attentions, his plans go wrong. The
ship does not put in at France, but instead continues on to
another port. From there he must work his way to Paris, taking
the common coach (full of all sorts of displeasing people), and
pass the battlefield at Waterloo, which was his greatest
disgrace. He begins to learn that the name of "Napoleon" is
either worshiped or scorned. People whom he has never known
claim to have been great allies of the former emperor. Others
spit at the mention of his name. He reaches Paris under some
duress and is sent to the home of someone who can help him until
the imposter reveals his true identity.
What Napoleon finds instead is that the poor wretch is dead, leaving a widow
and adopted child in financial duress. They remain in the care of Dr.
Lambert, a local medical practitioner who makes his meager earning by
tending the ill among Paris' lower quarters. Nichole "Pumpkin" Truchaut at
first mistrusts the guest she unwillingly takes under her roof, but slowly
comes to respect him. There is a certain sense of empowerment about this
aging man; he can lift the spirits of those around him with rousing speeches
and well-executed "battle plans." Dr. Lambert, both out of jealousy on the
part of Pumpkin's affection for her newfound friend and houseguest, and
suspicion toward the man's uncanny likeness to Bonaparte, seeks to drive
them apart -- or prove the man mad. In the meantime, Napoleon grows tired of
his charade, but can do nothing until his counterpart Eugene Lenormand
reveals himself. As for Eugene? He's enjoying writing "his" racy memoirs,
being petted and pampered, and scorning at the lower classes far too much to
even consider telling the truth. His word reigns supreme on the island, and
anyone who dares speak a whisper against him is promptly carted off as a
"lunatic."
As you can imagine, what unfolds is hilarity mixed with a good blend of
satire and a few meager twists. The film relies more on the charisma of
its actors and the unusual storyline to please, rather than going in for
a lot of action or plot twists. We all know what will happen in the end,
but the point is enjoying ourselves while getting there. In this means,
The Emperor's New Clothes
does please the viewer to a certain degree, though it embraces a
few ideals and morals I wasn't overly excited with. The real pleasure is
the chemistry between Ian Holm and Iben Hjejle, who plays Pumpkin.
Though the movie seems a little strange in its pursuit of a romance
between two people of such vastly different ages, Holm's Napoleon is so
likable you think little of it, much like Colonel Brandon and Marianne
in Sense & Sensibility. Unlike the latter film, this one is set
in France. I'm sure you know to what I allude; marriage comes later, if
at all.
The film is rated only PG and not even for mild sensuality, but there are
several scenes where Pumpkin and Napoleon are shown curled up in the same
bed; it's implied they go on living together. There's no other sensuality
aside from a "racy" passage a bookshop owner reads from the "fake"
Napoleon's memoirs. (We hear part of this passage dictated earlier in the
script.) It references Napoleon's "seduction" of the Polish princess, but
isn't terribly bawdy. There are several chest-up shots of Ian Holm bathing
but nothing explicit. The rating comes from brief mind language -- one d*mn,
one mild abuse of deity, and one anatomical reference. (Though I have to
admit, in its context due to what happens next, it's hilarious rather than
offensive.) There is also some bathroom humor; one man farts and complains
of bowl problems; another doctor talks briefly about digestive tracts, and
we hear Napoleon urinating on a tree.
No movie is perfect, but some of the brighter aspects of this
film make up for flaws. The torment Napoleon endures when he
discovers what his name truly means -- that hundreds of men have
gone mad under the delusion that they are Napoleon. His success
in turning Pumpkin's fruit stand into a thriving and prosperous
neighborhood business. When they first sit together on the roof
and watch an incoming storm. There are some unexplained
mysteries, but the film is fairly family-friendly and comical
enough to warrant a few laughs. Ian Holm turns in a beautiful
performance, although -- and I hate to admit this, but... he'll
always be a hobbit to me.