|
THE
HOUSE OF MIRTH
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5 Because
of: thematic elements, sensuality
Rated:
I
have to admit with open honesty that this is one of the few movies I
thought would never end. It dragged endlessly, had a totally depressing
and dull storyline, and even the performances didn't elevate my interest.
The only nice thing about it was the beautiful costuming... but I can get
the same effect by looking in my grandmother's photo albums or sticking An
Ideal Husband into the VCR. Something about this movie just didn't
work for me. It might be a matter of personal preference, but just in case
it isn't, allow me to warn you against a piece of eye candy with a dark
tone.
Lily Bart
(Gillian Anderson) is a
New York socialite who must find a husband by the end of the season. She
is very popular in general but no one of a marriageable nature has shown
an intimate interest in her. Not being of the nature to 'auction herself
off to the highest bidder,' she instead turns her attentions to pursuing
her individuality... and spending time with Lawrence Selden (Eric Stoltz), a coy,
outspoken, and charming barrister. In the meantime, her lavish lifestyle
has incurred many debts that she is unable to repay. Relying primarily on
the charity of friends, Lily struggles for financial independence. But
even her plight cannot convince Lawrence she is of the marrying kind and
he cannot her out of her forthcoming bankruptcy.
Deeply
in debt, Lily turns to a wealthy older man and friend Gus Trenor for
help. But his generosity has strings attached... he'll help her climb out
of her predicament if she agrees to become his mistress. Shocked and
appalled by his intentions, she seeks solace elsewhere. But her aunt has
caught wind of her extravagant spending habits and threatens to cut off
her small annual salary. In her struggle to maintain the friendships she
sees breaking around her and keep out of the poorhouse, Lily will receive
a piece of information that could be beneficial to her but would also harm the man she
loves.
The film is very beautiful to look but that
is about the extent of its depth. Extravagant costumes cannot cover the poor
character development and stinting acting. Anderson stumbles along for about an
hour in her role, remaining entirely unconvincing in her part until the later
half. (Part of this might be my impression that she doesn't fit in with the
costume setting. Some girls you can put in a corset and be stunned with
their natural charm and grace in a bustle; others cannot attain that
height of Victorian snobbery.) Many of the other actors also leave much to be desired and the
production's decision to film much of the story in darkened interiors leaves one
with the feeling of being cheated out of late Victorian-era architecture.
The
content of the film is hardly a problem when one overlooks the overall
depressing and melodramatic turnthe production takes in the final half. A few light
profanities and several hints at extramarital affairs in other people's lives
intrude through dialogue and mild intimations.
Trenor makes it very clear he wants more from Lilly than a thank you;
Lawrence's past also includes some rather disagreeable exchanges. Lily's 'friend' Bertha carries on one affair after another with all manner of
men and then accuses Lilly of being too forward in public with her husband.
Perhaps
I'm prejudiced or don't like movies with a 'downer' ending. I enjoy movies
with a darker twist but that end up in the light. Unfortunately this film
has no such redeeming turn. I foresaw the twist long before it entered the
story and was almost rooting for the characters to hurry up to the climax.
It seemed to drag endlessly.
Ideally, the producers might have chosen a more convincing and formidable
actress in the role -- someone like Kate Winslet -- if they truly wanted to pull
heartstrings. For now it's a depressing, fairly vulnerable film that opens
itself up to ridicule. You will either like it or hate it; unfortunately there
is no in-between.
|