|
IT
HAD TO BE YOU
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5 Because
of: sexual implications
Rated:
Just once I
would like to find a romantic comedy where two people are thrown together
and find love without already be "living" with someone else.
Most movies where the hero and heroine meet and fall in love while engaged
to other people promote our culture's obsession with attraction over love.
It Had to Be You is a rare gem in the sense the couple do the right
thing, but unfortunately it falls prey to the usual problems with the
genre... immorality and sexual conversations. It's pretty cute overall but
not something that should be on everyone's "must-see" list.
Former NYC policeman and aspiring author Charlie Hudson (Michael Vartan)
is about to marry the editor of a major publishing house. He's been with
Clara for five years and it seems time to finally tie the knot. His former
partner in the force, Henry (Michael
Rispoli) a struggling alcoholic, hates the woman.
Called abroad
to deal with clients, Clara gives Charlie a room at a hotel near Central
Park and tells him to finalize the rest of their wedding plans. In the
hotel elevator he meets bride-to-be Anna Penn (Natasha Henstridge), who is
also forging the world of dress patterns, gift purchasing, and silverware
choosing alone. The two meet up the following day at the bridal boutique
and laughingly help one another choose wedding touches, eventually forming
a friendship. Through a series of mini adventures, misunderstandings with
the local clergy and bartenders, Anna and Charlie begin to individually
question their impending marriages. Are they marrying the right person, or
did "the one" just meet them in the bridal shop? Anna's fiancée
is a cleaning-obsessed media magnet with no sense of humor, and Clara is
unbearably predictable.
Charlie
believes to let his true feelings be known at this point would be the move
of a "heel," but if he doesn't share his heart now, he may lose
out on true love forever. While being perky and cute, It Had to Be You
also has a few memorable discussions on marriage. The comedy is built
around the premise of how fickle people are in the modern age. When
purchasing wedding gifts, Anna is asked if it's her first or second
marriage. The woman at the boutique implies the first year of marriage is
spent in bed, and the second year in divorce court. Most of the people involved
in the bridal business are cynical toward the union God created to bring
happiness to two committed people. Charlie is encouraged by a hotel
repairman to take this chance, since even though the man loves his wife,
he always wondered what might have happened if he'd married another woman
instead. Basically what the film pushes is if you're not sure -- don't tie
the knot. It's not worth the time, expense, and personal pain.
I appreciated
that they didn't cheat on their perspective spouses but instead kept a
distance between them, primarily at Anna's initiative. In the background
of the story is the budding relationship with Henry and Anna's maid of
honor. Henry starts out an alcoholic who mocks the institution and
eventually becomes sober so he can be worthy of the woman he loves. When
he intimates it might be nice to go home together, Tracy tells him the
answer is no "because I'm a lady," but that he can walk her
home. Nice touch! However, it's still implied Charlie and Clara live
together. At one point she returns from London to his hotel room, takes
off her clothes, and asks him to make love to her while straddling him on
the bed. The scene was unnecessary and offensive. There's also an
unfortunate amount of discussion about "making love" (as a few
examples, Anna quips the cheesecake is better than sex, and Charlie responds
that she's sleeping with the wrong person; offhanded references are made
by the woman at the boutique, and pop up in "girl discussions"),
and some blatant double innuendos.
After falling
asleep in the tub and soaking the room below (which coincidentally belongs
to Charlie), Anna apologizes the next day for getting his room wet. The
woman listening in on their conversation obviously mistakes it for a
sexual conversation. Women are seen changing clothes several times.
There's some mild language but nothing I found overly offensive or
memorable. It's too bad immorality had to intrude because some of the
scenes are genuinely funny. The charisma between the leading roles is also
very good and some twists are thought-provoking. There's also a side plot
about how difficult it is to be a policeman in charge of suicide cases,
and the emotional devastation it wreaks.
|