|
JUDE
REVIEWED
BY JESSICA VAN DESSEL
YEAR
RELEASED: 1996
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: adultery, explicit sexuality
Rated:
Before Kate
Winslet was Kate Winslet, she had a number of small, interesting roles.
One of these can be seen in the Michael Winterbottom film Jude.
This movie is based on Thomas Hardy's novel Jude the Obscure, and
as the original title suggests, it tells the strange and convoluted tale
of one man's life and longings.
Christopher
Eccleston is Jude Fawley, a young working-class man in Victorian England.
When Jude was a boy, a schoolmaster fired him with a dream: to study at
the prestigious university of Christminister. Jude lacks the money, social
background and connections needed to gain admission to the university.
Nevertheless, he teaches himself Latin and Greek and makes every plan to
go. These plans are derailed by a local girl, Arabella (Rachael
Griffiths). Seeing Jude's seriousness as a challenge, she seduces him and
then, claiming pregnancy, compels him to marry her. They are ill-suited.
When no child is forthcoming from the supposed pregnancy, husband and wife
have a falling out. Arabella conveniently leaves for Australia, and Jude
is free to start again.
He
heads straight to Christminister. Since he can't be a student, he supports
himself by working as a stonemason. He keeps up his studies. He hopes. And
he meets his cousin, Sue Bridehead (Kate Winslet). Sue is an independent
working girl with unconventional beliefs. She challenges accepted social
mores. She speaks her mind freely. Like Jude, she wants something from
life, something that she can't quite define, something the world will not
allow. Sue and Jude have an immediate connection. At first, they put it
down to their kinship. But it quickly becomes apparent that their feelings
go deeper than that. When Sue looses her job, Jude personally arranges for
her to take a position with his old schoolmaster, Arthur Phillotson (Liam
Cunningham). Arthur soon proposes marriage to Sue. She accepts, hoping
this will cure the situation, but it only brings it to a head.
At this
shaky point in their lives, an unimaginable tragedy occurs. It will
tear apart everything they have ever thought or believed--and they will
not be able to cope with it in the same way. Jude is well made,
with nice period details. Photography and music are both used in haunting
ways to give that bleak, repressed English feel. The storyline sometimes
seem rushed or forced, but this is probably the result of trying to
condense a wordy Victorian novel into a two-hour movie. If the moviemakers
shortchanged the plot, they didn't skimp on the characters. Each one
strikes you as a fully drawn personality from the first moment they appear
on screen. Some of this comes from the strength of the acting. Sue
Bridehead was one of the performances that made everyone start to take
notice of Kate Winslet, and Christopher Eccleston and the rest of the cast
are of the same caliber. I like book-into-movie adaptations, but I'm very
picky about how they're done. As such as adaptation, Jude holds up pretty
well.
When
Hardy's book was first published, literary critics nicknamed it "Jude
the Obscene." While we needn't go quite that far with the movie,
there are
some content issues. The filmmakers were apparently under the delusion
that nobody goes to see a "famous-dead-author" movie unless you
spice it up. There are four fairly explicit sex scenes with full
nudity. There are some disturbing portrayals of death, both human and
animal. And there is the fact of Jude and Sue's adultery. The movie treats
them as heroes for being willing to throw off the shackles of convention,
etc. Religion is portrayed as something that causes you to close your mind
and deny your true self. If society had only been more enlightened, Jude
and Sue would have been happy.
Maybe so.
But the movie's confused, directionless plot, showing us Jude and Sue's
confused, directionless existence, leaves me with the feeling that life
without God is indeed obscure. Jude remains an interesting and
well-crafted film that's rather spoiled by too much titillation and
political correctness.
|