|
LAWS
OF ATTRACTION
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5
Because
of: sexual content
Rated:
A
film with a great deal of heart behind it, Laws of
Attraction is a favored type of romance: two
people meet. They hate one another, and then somehow
along the way start to fall in love. It's not typical
because of the setting but isn't quite wholly unique
because in some respects we've seen it before. But
nevertheless it is sweet. Audrey Woods (Julianne
Moore) is one of the top divorce attorneys in New
York. She graduated from Harvard with honors and
rapidly worked her way up into a partnership in a law
firm. Her clients are wealthy, elite, and all
suffering through bad marriages. Completely
self-assured and self-sufficient, Audrey has no room
for men in her life. Men lead to marriage, which leads
to divorce, which means pain, suffering, anguish, and
divided estates. There's just too much work and
heartache to bother with it, despite the promptings of
her struggling-to-stay-young mother Sara (Frances
Fisher).
Then
Daniel Rafferty (Pearce Brosnan) comes into her life.
Cocky, charming in a farm hick sort of way, with
mussed collars and stained ties, Audrey believes she
can take him out in a single afternoon. But horror
upon horror, Daniel is well known in the circuit, best
friends with the judge, and isn't afraid to play
dirty. She loses her case. Each determined to show the
other one up after a series of disastrous replays,
Audrey and Daniel are constantly pitted against one
another in the courtroom. She loses one, then wins
one, and on it goes in a never-ending cycle. The
biggest blow comes when fashion designer Serena
(Parker Posey) decides to get a divorce from her
womanizing rock star husband Thorne (Michael Sheen).
Serena was Audrey's client until Daniel stole
her away, so in defiance Audrey has approached Thorne
with an offer to win his case.
While
the two ex-lovers battle it out in the courtroom,
Audrey and Daniel are in for a battle of their own.
After getting drunk and spending a disastrous one
night stand together, they find attraction as well as
repulsion in one another's less-charming attributes.
It comes down to a battle over an estate in Ireland
and the lawyers are dispatched to interview the staff.
But a little too much illegal Irish whiskey may set
them down the road to disaster... and wedding bells.
It's true that we've seen a lot of the great moments
on the trailer, but there are ones you haven't yet
glimpsed. There's the humorous slide show shown at a
lawyer's conference in which Daniel uses Audrey as an
example. There's fighting over whether or not
anchovies belong in salad. There's the instance where
she turns up looking horrible at court, the one time
he looks fabulous. It's an all-out battle of the sexes
that becomes seriously complicated when love comes
into the equation.
There
are a lot of good points about the film. Despite being
a divorce attorney, Daniel believes that most marriage
problems could be solved simply by putting as much
passion into fixing the problem as the couples do
complaining about it. He does his job but when it
comes to Audrey, he wants to fix the issue. He comes
across as being a good guy, even though his methods
are occasionally below the belt. He likes to rub
Audrey's mistakes into her face, but isn't above being
outsmarted either. Audrey starts to come around to his
point of view, going from the cavalier attitude toward
a couple's most important decision to wanting to fight
for their relationship when it turns sour. The nice
thing about these two is that they grow to like
one another. There's nothing sweeter than seeing them
pass notes in the midst of a trial to ask whether they
should have Italian or Chinese for dinner, or sharing
a glass of wine in the kitchen after a long day.
If
it weren't for some serious flaws in moral thinking, I
would recommend it in a heartbeat. Brosnan and
Julianne have some good chemistry going and the story
is worthwhile and also very funny. But there are some
issues to contend with. Sexual dialogue comes in on
occasion. Mild abuse of deity and language are thrown
around (two uses of GD, a woman references multiple
times that she wants her husband's balls cut off and
thrown to the dogs in court, etc). There is a little
violence but it's all slapstick. The biggest problem I
had was with sexual content. Audrey and Daniel get
drunk on their first date, run home, and hop into bed.
The audience is treated to the sight of clothing
flying in all directions (they aren't seen undressing,
only waking up together the next morning). It's
implied that Daniel used their encounter to gain an
advantage; he steals her panties the next morning, and
writes a quote on them she said about the case the
following day in court. They are forced to sleep in
the same trailer bed after getting lost, but there's
no hanky panky. After getting married, they wake up in
bed together again, but the marriage after that is celibate.
Believing
a woman's screams imply she is in danger, Audrey
bursts in on a married couple having sex on the dining
room table. They're covered up with a blanket and
promptly stop, only to declare their marriage is back
on track and they won't need their lawyers anymore.
This isn't an issue per-say, but Audrey and Daniel are
married by a justice of the peace rather than a
minister. It provides the opportunity for some
courtroom jokes but leaves the film without religious
influence. There's also a lot of drinking -- wine with
dinner, beer on their time off, illegal alcohol in
Ireland, and a drink dubbed "Goat's Balls"
that isn't meant to be consumed in quantity (they do
anyway). It's really too bad that a couple of scenes
had to ruin this film, for it's really rather cute on
the surface, and does imply that marriage is worth
fighting for, a moral that that couples and courts of
this land need to heed.
|