|
LOST
SOULS
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5
Because
of: language, thematic elements
Rated:
Antichrist
thrillers are a dime a dozen in Hollywood. Even the Christian market has
tried to get in on the excitement, producing dozens of poorly written and
badly executed "end times" thrillers in an effort to corner the
market. This is yet another example of an attempt to cash in on cheap
thrills, the result being a decently scary mind-bender with an ultimately
unsatisfactory ending.
Behind the
barred doors of a mental institution is a patient who has requested an
exorcist. Despite the argument of his practicing physician and her
associates, Father Lareaux (John Hurt) is summoned to attempt to cast the
demons out of him. Accompanying him in this task is Maya Larkin (Winona
Ryder), a convert to Catholicism and former possessed soul. Haunted by
memories of her own demonic infestation, her presence in the room cannot
prevent the demons from wrecking havoc. Lareaux is dragged from the cell
in a comatose state, while the patient lapses into madness. But he did
manage to say one or two things in-between the exorcism attempts; the
demon in him spit out a series of numerical codes, which Maya is able to decipher.
It is the name of a man meant to be infested with the persona of the
antichrist.
Peter
Kelson (Ben Chaplin) is a world-renowned author and psychologist,
specializing in social disorders. His life's work is to prove that demons
do not exist, but are nothing more than the nature of man. He does not
believe in Evil, and is unimpressed but intrigued when Maya comes to his
office late one evening and asks if she might have the task of convincing
him that his theories are wrong. As they are swept up into a supernatural
battle between the forces of good and evil, the hour approaches when Satan
is due to manifest in the body of his chosen follower. Following a
complicated series of events and clues, Lost Souls is a decent
attempt but not impressive due to its lack of intent.
In the end,
you're not quite certain what the director or the writers meant by it, and
that leaves the audience with a feeling of disappointed uncertainty.
Having seen the last few minutes of this long ago on television, I was
prepared but it has upset a great many other moviegoers with its lack of
potential. Then too are the religious arguments, such as whether or not a
devout Catholic priest could be possessed, much less the assumption that
Satan could only infest a single human being over a two-thousand-year
period. There are implications of a great many demonic influences but none
from the other side of the table; one would expect a little more angelic
intervention if Satan did indeed have a master plan like this one. That
aside, it was a decent thriller with more than its fair share of scares.
The exorcisms are spine-chilling, and the film was done in such a way that
there's very little color or light, making it all the more eerie and
atmospheric.
There
isn't a great deal of content, much less than I anticipated given the
genre. There are no spinning heads or demon mucus. Exorcisms are often
violent and wrought with scary special effects, multiple voices, and
screaming. Several people are shot and killed. Maya experiences dark
visions in which she is tormented by spectral beings intending her harm;
in one of them, the toilets in a public restroom back up and spill filth
onto the walls and floor. There are three or so f-words, a couple harsh
abuses of deity, and one or two profanities. There's no sexual content,
but some banter about a dream in which Peter is haunted by a book called
XES. In conclusion, it was a worthwhile watch if you're willing to limit
your disbelief and not take it as gospel.
|