|
INSPECTOR
LYNLEY MYSTERIES:
FOR
THE SAKE OF ELENA
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: homosexuality, language
Rated:
Early
in the morning on a college campus, a young woman goes
jogging. Crossing a quaint bridge over quiet waters,
she pauses to inspect a figure laying in the road. Her
fingers unearth a suit stuffed with hay -- and she is
slammed over the head from behind, knocking her to the
ground. Little over an hour later, artist Sarah Gordon
(Cherie Lunghi) comes to sketch on the bridge... and
finds the girl's body. The jogger was Elena Weaver
(Samantha Baker), one of the most popular girls at the
nearby women's college. She was fun, flirtatious, a
top student... and also deaf. Her wealthy father disapproved
of her learning sign language. Her stepmother Justine
(Sophie Ward) wasn't overly fond of her. Her roommate
can reveal nothing of Elena's state of mind, or why
she would have gone out alone. There
are also the men in Elena's life, jumbled family
relationships, peculiar inconsistencies in Elena's
normal habits, and more than one scandal lurking just
below the surface as the family must deal with burying
a beautiful girl. Inspector Thomas Lynley (Nathaniel Parker) and his
partner Barbara Havers (Sharon
Small) unearth more than one morbid twist at the
school. What about the teacher who is known for
carrying on with his students? The jealous best
friend? The possibilities are endless but all boil
down to a surprising twist involving jealousy and
betrayal. True to form, there are plenty of red
herrings, suspicious characters, and more than the
usual amount of speed bumps along the way. Many of the
episodes from this series involve adultery on some
level; in this instance it takes center stage, along
with implied promiscuity, sly winks at lesbianism, and
some harsh abuse of deity. As
mysteries go this one is decent in structure and
planning. The characters continue to develop and grow
and it hooks you with some fabulous twists. Lynley and
Havers are both very likable, arguing their way
through difficult situations and letting more than one
romantic spark fly. You can tell they're eventually
destined for item hood but in the meantime enjoy
provoking one another's temper, while Lynley yearns
for a boyhood sweetheart. The film points fingers in
one direction and then swivels around to shock us;
this is carried out very well, given the nature of the
plot's structure. There are only so many characters
and therefore the murderer must be one of them. The
atmosphere is also very moody and while Lynley takes
on the case with deliberation, it's slightly lacking
in emotion. The main problem here is all the sexual
implications and references. Language is more of an
issue as well, with four abuses of Christ's name and
one vulgar British expression, along with mild
profanity. Violence
is minimal with only a brief glimpse of the dead
girl's bloodstained body, but sexual references and
implications run pretty high. We learn a main
character is involved in an adulterous relationship
despite his current wife, who he also carried on an
affair with while married to yet another woman. He
embraces his wife from behind (his arms encircle her
breasts) and asks her to come to bed. She refuses and
later apologies for it, offering willingness "if
he still wants to" (he doesn't). One of the
teachers is revealed to have been "sexually harassing"
Elena. He becomes fed up with Havers' accusations and
reveals himself to her by throwing his bathrobe at her
feet. The audience briefly sees backside nudity. We
also see Lynley showering through a hazy door at a
distance (some details are still visible) before he
comes out in a towel. Elena is revealed to be a
"promiscuous little slut." There is an
allusion to rape, and her dorm partner is a lesbian
currently involved in a "female
relationship." Her partner goes home to face the
difficult path of "telling her parents about
them." I
really like Lynley and his quirky police partner, but
Elizabeth George makes it difficult to enjoy her
stories with so many clandestine affairs, homosexual
characters, and playful motives. It would nice to sit
down and watch this pair in a less one-track-minded
film. It's interesting and thought-provoking for older
teens and adults but I would recommend Poirot
instead.
|