Nuremberg
(2001)
Our rating: 4 out of 5
Rated: TV14
reviewed by Charity Bishop
It is almost difficult to categorize one's feelings after this film,
because it is so profound in its subtle nuances that the audience feels
both tremendous loss for all that transpired during the Nazi regime, and
accomplishment and pride that those responsible for the horrific war
crimes were justly prosecuted and executed.
With the world still reeling from the aftermath of Hitler's deranged, bloody
attempts to take over Europe and govern from a central superpower, it
becomes a matter of global importance to prosecute and punish those within
custody, former members of the Third Reich and Hitler's closest allies and
confidantes. The most esteemed member of the prisoners of war is
Reichsmarschall Hermann Wilhelm Göring (Brian Cox), the charming but
cold-blooded right hand of Hitler's propaganda-spewing panel of associates.
He and twenty others are to be brought before the tribunal, formed of the
four governing countries that stood against Hitler -- America, Britain,
France, and Russia -- to account for the mass slaughter of Jews in the
concentration camps, and general crimes against humanity. The first trial of
its kind, the entire future of war prosecution rests on the success of the
lead prosecutor to get a series of convictions, and send the message to the
waiting world that war crimes are still crimes, and must be vindicated.
President Truman feels the best man for the job is Justice Robert Jackson (Alec
Baldwin) of the Supreme Court. Supported by British Prosecutor Sir David
Maxwell-Fyfe (Christopher Plummer) and well-assisted by his chief secretary
Elsie Douglas (Jill Hennessey), Jackson intends to make an example of the
twenty-one stone-faced defendants. But he is unprepared for Göring's defiance in
the courtroom, and his enigmatic portrayal of a man entirely innocent of the
charges brought against him have won more than one secret admirer. Among them is
Göring's assigned jailer, Lt. Tex Wheelis (Scott Gibson), whom we see slipping
further and further beneath his elite prisoner's anti-Semitic stance. Assigned
to the cell block is Jewish psychologist Capt. Gustav Gilbert (Matt Craven), who
is attempting to discern the nature of evil and grant insights to the
prosecution as to the emotional state of their defendants.
What the film is comprised of is a significantly complex sequence of events
that follows the trial from its conception through to its convictions and
subsequent executions. Everything about the production is impressive. Not
only does it read like a list of "America and Europe's best underappreciated
actors" (Baldwin, Plummer, Michael Ironside), but the writing behind it is
absolutely phenomenal. Its honest exploration of evil, the concept that
formed Göring as an alternating empathetic and horrific defendant, both
magnetic and repulsive, the means with which it toys with your emotions, are
all very well carried out with absolutely beautiful performances. The
dramatic contrast between Göring and Jackson is evident in the footage
shared between them, of the shrewd and calculating glances, in how
successfully they unnerve one another. One of the most profound ponderings
the film offers is Amen's ultimate conclusion that the only thing the
defendants have in common is a "lack of empathy," and therefore "Evil is the
absence of empathy."
Those of intellectual depth enough to be fascinated by the film should be
forewarned that it is historically authentic and therefore the audience shares
in the horror of those present in being shown the true facts of what transpired
in the concentration camps. Historical accounts from survivors and observers are
read and acted out, depicting the mass genocide of millions of Jewish people.
They are described multiple times as being stripped naked and herded into mass
graves, where they are slaughtered, gassed in chambers, or thrust into freezing
water in "experiments." A significant scene shows real-life footage from the
death camps -- emancipated, naked bodies barely recognizable because of their
starving condition are thrown into pits, bulldozed, and heaped in piles. You
cannot watch it without being aghast at the nature of evil, and the absolute
cruelty of mankind. It leaves the courtroom audience in a state of tearful
silence.
We witness the execution of those sentenced to death by hanging. One
defendant consumes cyanide and dies; another hangs himself in his cell. A
heart attack is nearly prompted due to a physical fight between a guard and
a prisoner. There is also the beginnings of an affair between Jackson and
Elsie; despite him having a wife at home, the two are shown kissing on
several occasions. It's not indicated whether it went any further, and the
concluding implication is that he might divorce his wife. There is some
language, comprised of profanities and one or two mild abuses of deity. I
really enjoyed the film because not only was it a fascinating glimpse into a
time in history the world would do well never to forget, it was also a
classy and heartfelt glimpse into one of the most successful trials of all
time.