Oliver
Twist (2005)
Our rating: 4 out of 5
Rated: PG13
reviewed by Carissa Horton
Orphans are some of the most mistreated, neglected, and despised of Gods
children. All because they had no control over their circumstances and
those of their parents. Oliver Twist (Barney Clark) is one such boy. But
unlike other boys, Oliver has not allowed the bitterness surrounding him
to tarnish the goodness of his spirit. And in that very goodness lies
the supposed "evil" nature that his betters suspect. Oliver is honest to
a fault, even down to requesting a forbidden "more" for his supper. He
earns the loathing of the men in charge of the workhouse where he
resides. They do everything within their power to send him away, even
down to willingly paying a man to take Oliver off their hands.
And so, little Oliver, no more than ten years old, finds himself working
for the local undertaker. Mr. Sowerberry (Michael Heath) seems a kindly
man, apart from the ferocious nature of his wife (Gillian Hanna). When
it comes down to deciding whether to do right by the boy or obeying his
wife, he fails immeasurably. Oliver is left with no choice but to turn
his thoughts and feet toward London society, where perhaps he might find
a kind soul. With butchered and bleeding feet, Oliver finally drags
himself on the last legs of his seventy mile journey to London. Weak and
shivering, he catches the sharp eye of a boy known only as the Artful
Dodger (Harry Eden). The lad sees Oliver's needs and takes advantage of
his obvious youth and naiveté. Dodger drafts young Oliver into a gang of
thieves and runaways guided by the elderly hand of Fagin (Ben Kingsley).
Fagin seems kind at first, even humorous in his own way, but his
association with a man such as Bill Sikes (Jamie Foreman) gives reason
for deep suspicion. Oliver cant even comprehend that his new companions
are of the thieving variety, even sweet Nancy (Leanne Rowe), girlfriend
to Sikes, who has taken Oliver under her wing.
His training in the art of burgling pocket handkerchiefs and pocket
books begins, but Oliver is sent out into the street before fully
prepared. Perhaps, somehow, he never realized just what the job
entailed, and when he first sees the Dodger pinch a pocket hankie from
an old man in front of a book store, shock is his first reaction. A
reaction which earned him a chase through the streets by people shouting
"thief!" and a visit to the nearest magistrate. Thankfully, the abused
gentleman becomes aware that Oliver is not to blame for the theft, and
goes so far as to bring the boy home with him. Mr. Brownlow (Edward
Hardwicke) is kindly and compassionate, even trusting to a certain
level, wanting to believe the best of the child. But Oliver knows too
much concerning Fagin's business and he cannot be trusted to keep from
squealing. Oliver is about to have his first lesson in the school of
hard-knocks.
I have seen at least three versions of Oliver Twist, and each
have had their remarkable specialties, be it in cinematography, acting,
or musical score. This particular classic has been remade numerous
times, with little things changed here and there, but almost always the
same sense of storytelling. This version if very dark and morbid, but
not so much as to leave you shivering by the end. Oliver is mistreated
by way of punches, kicks, and words from various people ranging from his
elders to children his own age. Fagin has his good points, one seeming
to be an honest affection for the boys under his care. But his bad
points include a nasty temper and a tendency to handle sharp objects in
a way which makes a threatening point to his youngsters. Sikes. Well,
what can you say of him, except that he is ill-mannered, abusive on
every level, including woman beating, and wont hesitate to commit
murders in the most villainous style. A woman is bludgeoned to death,
though off-camera, blood splattered about the room. A dog is vilely
treated by its owner, including kicks, and therefore has a temper to
match that of its master. A young boy is shot in the arm and while being
bandaged, you see the rather ghastly wound. A man is hung by his own
clumsiness, but the scene is not as gruesome as some I have witnessed.
Overall, these boys are frightened into submission by people who should
be taking on the guise of protector and guardian. The very appearance of
London is disgusting and degrading and therefore quite convincing for
the time. Spiritually, young Oliver Twist is an inspiring character. He
holds true to a belief in God throughout the entire film, no matter his
situation. He always believes the best will come of everything, and he
possesses a sincere sorrow at the choices made by some of his
companions. Any sexual problems are kept to a minimum. Nancy and Sikes
are obviously intimate without marriage, but nothing is ever shown or
even really implied. Nancy and one of her friends wear extremely low-cut
gowns now and again, but also possess modest ones, so you never know
which will be in the next scene. There are bawdy sections involving bars
with much drinking. The boys, not all mind you, but some, do smoke
pipes. Language is used minimally.
I have seen many a young actor in my life. Some good, some poor, but
none quite as believable as Barney Clark. The child is a marvel
onscreen, really bringing the depth of Olivers character to life. He and
his counterpart, John Howard Davies, from the 1948 version, possess an
equal amount of talent and I was very impressed with his performance.
Ben Kingsley as well, did a superb job. He was humorous, but also
possessed a vicious quality that only comes from living on the street
your entire life. But in spite of his remarkable performance, I almost
found it to be mimicking that of Alec Guinness in the 1948 version.
There were too many similarities, even down to the appearance. I only
wish that Leanne and Harry had been given more of a chance to shine.
Much like I wish Nicholas Rowe's character had been integrated more into
the telling of
Nicholas Nickleby. What disappointed me most was the performance of
Jamie Foreman as Sikes. He could terrify, true, but in the end, I wasn't
impressed with the character.
There was no depth to the performance, no real spark that spoke of a man
enjoying the role and putting his all into performing it well. I would take
Robert Newton's performance any day of the week. What it comes down to is a
fantastic storyline containing minor weaknesses. The climax was not as
impressive as it could have been. Roman Polanski gives us marvelous
cinematography, and a rather engaging musical score, but some scenarios
needed to be followed through. I found sections missing from previous
versions which would have added a great deal to the film itself. There was
much I loved about it, and some that didn't impress me either way. It boils
down to what you prefer in a movie. I enjoyed it. I will see it again and
gladly. It is a spiritually uplifting film and gives a vast impression of
one boys determination to follow what he knows to be right. Oliver never
hates, never despises those who hold him in contempt. He is remarkable and I
enjoyed the movie more due to his sweet spirit.
|