|
PORTRAIT
OF A LADY
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 3 out of 5 Because
of: nudity, sexual content, thematic elements Rated:
Isabel
Archer (Nichole Kidman) is a strong-willed and determined young woman who has just
turned down a perfectly good wedding proposal -- to the distress
of her uncle and the wan curiosity of her cousin, the sickly Ralph
Touchett (Martin Donovan), who is not expected to live out the year. A bright and
charming if innocent and naive young American, she finds the
wealthy lord does not please her and is determined to stay single.
When
her uncle dies he leaves her a vast fortune, a surprise
to her aunt and her charming friend Madame Merle (Barbara Hershey), who encourages
her to follow her dreams and to take advantage of the life before
her.
Isabel travels to Rome on holiday where she encounters -- at Madame Merle's
insistence -- the languid and
strangely mysterious Gilbert Osmond (John Malkovich), a man with neither fame nor
fortune, ambition, or good looks. Yet Isabel is drawn
to him and his daughter, the silent and reclusive Pansy (Valentina
Cervi) who has
lived her life in a convent under the care of the nuns. A year
passes, and Lord Warburton, whose proposal had been so callously
tossed aside, not once but twice has come to repay her a visit, to
seek out the rumors that she has broken her promise of remaining
single to marry this Mr. Osmond. Indeed she has and sends him off
with a rebuff. She has been drawn to Gilbert's tastes and his
apparently passionate love for her and plunges ahead into wedded
bliss, despite her cousin's predictions that she will be
unhappy. But what the future holds is much more than she had
anticipated, from Pansy's first love interest to the truth behind
Gilbert Osmond as well as Madame Merle.
If
the film is anything in particular, it's strange and unnerving.
The director uses often close angels, paying particular attention
to hands and eyes, but the scenes are dark and overall it's depressing and suggestive. It takes too long to tell a very
uncomplicated story and with the omitted fifteen minutes of
interest in the very middle of the film, I was uncommonly bored
and only finished it to complete my review. The
opening begins with Australian women speaking of their first kiss
(what does that have to do with 1872 England, I ask you?) to a
strange black and white series of shots in the "silent
picture" style that offer the film's most pointed reason for
staying away from the story altogether -- female frontal nudity.
There is little language and no violence but the overall sense of
the film is manipulation and seduction. Isabel imagines being
kissed and caressed by the men in her life in an eerie scene in
her chambers. Osmond comes on to Madame Merle and fondles
her. (His hand goes down instead of up, if you get my drift.) There's a nude statue in one scene and Osmond strikes Isabel
with a glove several times as well as stepping on the hem of her
gown to purposefully trip her.
The last fifteen minutes of the film are
of Isabel saying goodbye to her dying cousin (kissing him and
staying close beside his bedside) and then again being confronted
by Lord Warburton, who passionately kisses her and offers her a
chance for happiness... all while she's still married. Portrait
of a Lady a depressing waste of two
hours that offers brief but startling nudity, eeriness, and the
hint of immorality with no redeeming qualities.
The only thing halfway intelligent anyone says is that people
must bear the results of their own decisions. Nicole
Kidman was as lovely as ever and seemed especially at home in the
lovely period costumes. For the first time I actually thought John
Malkovich did a good performance. (Perhaps playing the nasty
seducer of innocents is his forte?) His utterly dry, languid, and
boring tone is ideal for Osmond. If you want pretty costumes, a hint of
scandal and a depressing ending, forget this and
get Gone With the Wind.
©
www.charitysplace.com
- all rights reserved.
|