Princess
of Thieves (2001)
Our rating: 4 out of 5
Rated: PG
reviewed by: Charity Bishop
Tales have long been told of the noble thief Robin Hood
and his love for Maid Marion... but few know of the
child that was given them. The importance of an heir is
vast, and Prince John orders the sheriff to place a
bounty on the child's head at its birth double to that
of the father. But when the Sheriff of Nottingham learns
that the child is a girl, the bounty is dropped... and
Gwen is forgotten.
Raised in the monastery of Fryer Tuck, Gwen (Kiera Knightley) is a
strong-willed young woman with very black and white views of the world.
Largely ignored by her father (Stuart Wilson)
due to her gender, her only companionship is found in the young novice
Froderick. But even his sweet temperament and eager-to-please mentality
cannot repair her grievous relationship with Robin Hood. The daring outlaw
is in Jerusalem, fighting with King Richard. But when a war wound leaves the
king close to death, Robin must return and see his illegitimate son Philip
(Stephen Moyer) to the throne... before the King's tyrannical brother Prince
John (Jonathan Hyde) is crowned. Her patriotism running strong, mingled with
desperation to appear in her father's eyes worthy, Gwen pleads with him to
allow her to accompany the Merry Men on this quest. But Robin is adamant
that it is no place for a young woman, and sets out the following day,
leaving a sullen daughter behind. In the meantime, Prince John has sent out
an order that Philip is not to arrive in England alive and the prince's
valet is mistakenly murdered. Philip is alone and lost in England. And Gwen
is determined to impress her father... even if she must masquerade as a
young man to do it. Eventually their paths will collide and it will be up to
Gwen to see the young man upon the throne... and to save her father from
death.
Overly predictable, Princess of Thieves is at most an entertaining
check-your-brain-at-the-door flick perfect for teenagers seeking an
alternative to the male-dominated world of Robin Hood. Gwen is a lot of fun,
from her spirited verbal tousles with anyone willing to debate to her
obviously incredible archery skills and her kind heart. Froderick is at
times funny... and in other instances, cringingly immature. And Philip?
Well, Philip is the expected "Please don't crown me" monarch who would much
rather live a simple life. As everyone knows she will, Gwen talks him into
the job by pointing out how terribly the people have been treated under
Prince John's reign. Thus said, although the film is a nice little
production with reasonably good values and a couple of attached moral
lessons, there is nothing very original. The script writers pretty much
borrowed off the Robin Hood plight that's been seen and done before... the
archery tournament... the evil Sheriff... the tyrannical Prince John... And
the Philip-Gwen struggle is pretty much the Prince Henry-Danielle debate
from Ever After : a selfish, spoiled monarch who is brought around by
a poor but sensible young woman. Really the only originality is the
untypical ending that closes on a bittersweet note.
The acting is praiseworthy although I had a bit of difficulty accepting
Stuart Wilson as Robin Hood. He's a very amiable actor and is by far the
best in the slew of embarrassingly-bad swordfighters in the film. The only
truly great actress in the bunch is young Kiera Knightley herself. Largely
unknown, she looks very much like the British actress Keeley Hawes and is
both very pretty and incredibly good. Typically the film is not without its
soft points. There are several inappropriate uses of God's name and some
violence. But what bothered me most was the implication that Philip was
something of a playboy. "I've known many women, my friend," he tells his
valet on the differences between "love" and survival, "but there isn't one
that I wouldn't trade right now for some bread and cheese." But it should be
noted that he keeps in check his romantic feelings for Gwen when he believes
her to be engaged to Frederick. Gwen's thieving nature is never really
debated. She steals from a wealthy merchant in town and justifies it by the
fact that he was mistreating a street waif. She then attempts to sneak off
with Philip's horse and only later refuses because he would give it to her
due to her gender. For that reason, I wouldn't encourage showing the film to
anyone without a good grasp of right and wrong. These are dangerous lessons
for less-wary youngsters. Yes, it's predictable and it wouldn't have held up
in a run at the box office, but it is an entertaining and almost-innocent
way to spend two hours if you like a good adventure, a bit of romance, and a
girl that lets it be known that gender has nothing to do with talent or
ability. This is one Princess that stands on her own two feet.
|