Private
Life of Sherlock Holmes
Our rating: 3 out of 5
Rated: PG13
reviewed by Charity Bishop
After the death of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, unlike
many other great literary authors, he encouraged the
public to continue their pursuit of stories
concerning the legendary detective. Out of this
liberal freedom sprang numbers of pastiches on
screen, stage, and film. Most retain the original
spirit of Sherlock Holmes and his biographer but
along with them come degrees of liberal varying
opinions, stories of Holmes' early and late cases,
his true feelings toward the female sex and why, and
his drug addiction. One later series of novels by
Laurie R. King proposes that the great detective
married a woman less than half his age by the name
of Mary Russell. Yet another had him solve the true
case surrounding the assassination of Abraham
Lincoln in the excellent Surrogate Assassin.
The film pastiches have been less successful... with
the exception of one. The Private Life of
Sherlock Holmes, which bills itself as a serious
drama but is actually an intriguing story part
satire and part genuine nod to the canon.
Somewhere in a London bank vault lies the unpublished volume of Dr. John
Watson concerning his dearest friend Sherlock Holmes. Because of the
sensitive nature of the case in certain events, as well as his friend's
feelings toward the case's conclusion, the story was never turned over
to Strand magazine for public consumption. Only fifty years after
Watson's death may it be unlocked. The tale is one of puzzling elements.
Sherlock Holmes (Robert Stevens) is bored after one of his successful
cases, but tributes the solving to the singular lack of talent toward
the criminal class. They simply have no imagination anymore! He accuses
Dr. Watson (Colin Blakely) of "Romanizing" his cases and turning them
into entertaining fairy stories, while building up his eccentric nature
in the eye of the public. For example, he is not a cocaine addict simply
because he indulges on an occasional basis. Nor has he ever said,
"Elementary, my dear Watson."
None of the recent cases which have been pressed before him are of
interest and only through Watson's persistence does he accept two
anonymous tickets to the ballet (Holmes abhors ballet). Afterward he is
taken backstage to meet the leading ballerina (who does not look 39
because she's actually 49!) and discovers she merely wants him as an
alliance to create the most "beautiful and brilliant child in the
world." Worming his way out of this situation and ruining Watson's
reputation in the process, Holmes is given a case of consequence when a
beautiful foreigner (Genevive Page) turns up on his doorstep suffering
from amnesia. She can remember nothing except being attacked in London
and thrown into the Thames. Through their resulting investigation they
are lead into a peculiar case of canary birds, the woman's missing
husband, seven midgets, and a London writing address no more than an
empty house.
They are also brought into the social circle of
Holmes' brother Mycroft (Christopher Lee) and end
their journey at Loc Ness, where sightings of a
monster have been reported. Though the film is
sometimes tongue in cheek and a few of the gags in
bad taste, I was surprised how serious and deep it
was able to turn in the second half. The great
detective is surprisingly humane but still retains
the characteristics we've all grown to smile
tolerantly over. When confronted with a hysterically
sobbing woman, he uncomfortably tells her to "stop
it this instant!" There's a hint of the mischievous
and even flirtatious in his manner particularly when
dealing with Gabrielle. Entering her darkened room
in the middle of the night and first covering her
bare shoulders up, he then noisily bangs the copper
fixture over his head with her parasol. "I am
sorry," he says gleefully when she starts awake,
"but as long as you're up..."
The film toys with his affections, never quite telling us whether Holmes
merely appreciates Gabrielle as he did Irene Adler or if he did in fact
fall in love with her at some point. The rest of the characters are well
enough but the movie does have two demeaning elements to the Holmes
brothers. The first is Mycroft's appearance as a rather jaded dark
horse. He insults Sherlock's methods of investigation and sneers at him
contemptuously from his position in the government, whereas the true
Mycroft was always in awe of his little brother's ability to solve
difficult cases unassisted. I wasn't very happy with this exchange since
it sets them at odds rather than working compatibly as they did in the
books. There's a bit of humor added through this aspect when Mycroft
receives a response he didn't anticipate and Sherlock is able to give
him a dignified jibe. The second is Holmes and how easily he was
outsmarted in one aspect of the case. Seeing him brought to his knees in
humiliation (though no one ever learns of it) is demeaning somehow.
Having originally been planned for a three and a
half hour production, over an hour of footage has
been chopped from The Private Life of Sherlock
Holmes and disappointingly never restored. It
would have blended together the odd opening with
later events. As it stands now, there are flaws
aside from production and personal taste to be found
in the script. There is little violence and only two
profanities. But director Billy Wilder was well
known for his fanciful little explanations and
jokes. Taking advantage of a then-obsessive
fascination with Holmes' lifelong bachelorhood, he
engrained a segment which questions Holmes'
sexuality. Having been introduced delicately to the
Russian ballerina's desire for him to spend two
weeks with her abroad in the hope a beautiful child
will result, Holmes worms his way out the only
manner in which will fail to insult her. He mentions
that her similar rejection from a composer who does
not "like" women (Holmes was a third choice) is not
an isolated case. Naturally they assume Holmes is
gay, and Watson is his lover.
When discovering the truth in another tongue in
cheek conversation, the doctor storms home and
rallies about their reputations and how they'll have
to part now lest gossip ruin their careers. Holmes
persuades him this is preposterous and no one would
dare repeat such a story. Watson agrees and proposes
that at least they have women to back them up...
don't they, Holmes? With a delicate little smile the
detective tells him not to be too presumptuous.
(This mild implication and possibility is later
countered by his gentleness toward Gabrielle.)
Watson is something of a ladies' man but nothing is
shown other than dancing with ballerinas (he backs
out when Russian men begin taking their place,
believing that he is homosexual) and commenting that
they have fine backsides. When Gabrielle is brought
to the house there's a little banter about what's to
be done with her. She's put into Watson's room (at
Mrs. Hudson's accusing stare Watson exclaims, "I'll
sleep on the couch!") and they discover her the next
morning in Holmes' apartment.
During the night the disoriented woman woke up and
mistook Holmes for her husband, coming out undressed
to embrace him. (The camera shows her bare back and
shoulders but nothing more.) He was intrigued by
something on her hand, the print of a railway
ticket. He covered her up and sent her back to bed,
not returning until the following morning... when
naturally Watson and Mrs. Hudson believe he took
liberties. Humorously he allows their speculations
before uncovering the truth. From there on out
there's very little in the way of inappropriate
conversation or speculation. Holmes and Gabrielle go
undercover as a married couple in Scotland but sleep
apart. We see Gabrielle's bare back again before he
covers her up. She wears a dressing gown that
reveals some cleavage. There's also some drug
content but it's always implied and never shown.
These elements -- particularly the gay segment, however lightly
portrayed -- are enough to give viewers a pause but it's actually quite
a good mystery. It's also quite funny without demeaning the characters
to slapstick comedy. Incidents such as Holmes asking Watson to kindly
clasp his hands and then using them as a stepping stone, his explanation
to Gabrielle why women are unreliable (his fiance had the audacity to
die the week before their wedding), and banter with Mycroft make for
some wonderful moments. Despite my initial concerns that Holmes would be
butchered by an overly sarcastic script, I found him both likable and
humane. It's a film quiet in its deeper implications and something I
would watch more than once for the artistic and literary merit.
|