Sherlock:
A Case of Evil (2003)
Our rating: 3 out of 5
Rated: R
reviewed by Charity Bishop
When it comes to this film, devout fans of the
famous Baker Street detective are severely divided.
Some of us hate it. Others adore it. We can argue on
its merits or lack thereof until the end of time. I
believe it depends on how much of a Puritan you are
and how hard you try on whether or not you'll find
this TNT production worthwhile. Naturally curiosity
to see which side was right overcame reason and when
I had a chance to obtain this film cheaply, I took
it. The result left me with mixed feelings, wishing
they might have trimmed some aspects and lengthened
others, but overall I found it a reasonable case if
not entirely true to the calculating nature of the
Holmes we know and love.
Two figures run through the shadowy streets of
London, engaged in violent swordplay. After a
stunning duel the older man reaches for his revolver
and is shot and killed by the younger. His body
falls into the local sewage system. Two policeman
who happen to be passing by at the time place the
young man under arrest. His name is Sherlock Holmes
(James D'Arcy) and he has just killed a criminal
mastermind. Holmes was put on the case by the
appearance of a beautiful young widow being
blackmailed by an unknown fiend over her husband's
previous indiscretions. The news of his success
spreads through London via the talented writings of
a struggling journalist and Holmes is granted a
measure of respect by Inspector Lestrade (Nicholas
Gecks) at Scotland Yard. Dealing with his newfound
popularity becomes something of a challenge and it's
not long before another case is presented at his
fingertips. This client is not so wonderful. He's
one of the local drug warlords and fears for his
life.
His competition -- those who peddle opium and
morphine on the streets -- are being systematically
eliminated. Holmes would have no interest in the
case were it not for the irregularity of its
victims. They are brutally slashed from ear to ear
and their bodies injected with a powerful narcotic.
Through his client pulling social strings, Holmes is
allowed to sit in on the autopsy of the most recent
victim. In charge of the procedure is Dr. John
Watson (Roger Morlidge), a fresh-out-of-medical
school aspiring journalist with a penchant for
inventing useful objects. Their first meeting is
hardly compatible but over time, as they slice
brains and investigate the results of drugs on the
human physique, Watson and Holmes are united against
Lestrade, who desires to write the case off,
believing it is simply solved, and spend no more
time or expenses on it, and become friends. Holmes
is convinced there's something far more devious
behind these attacks than mere random serial
killings.
When his client turns up in the morgue, Holmes is further assured the case
cannot be so simply solved, and that Professor Moriarty (Vincent D'Onofrio)
is behind it. His investigation leads him to beautiful Rebecca Doyle
(Gabrielle Anwar), who has unknowingly been a pawn in a dangerous game of
power and corruption. Holmes faces the worst of human nature, the endless
cocaine syringe at the hand of an enemy, and his own dark side as he battles
to unearth the truth in a world of darkness. Admittedly the storyline is a
good one. Were it not for the dreadful inconsistencies in a youthful Holmes
with the much older, settled, and skeptical cases of his counterpart, I
would recommend it as a show of excellence in screen writing. The plot is
not, as I'd originally feared, yet another case of matching Holmes against
Jack the Ripper. Whitechapel does not even feature prominently in the case.
The writing is clever, the acting quite good, and the soundtrack absolutely
exquisite. James D'Arcy did not easily convince me at first. I spent thirty
minutes trying to persuade myself that he was indeed Holmes, but eventually
came to appreciate his performance. The most difficult thing to swallow was
the precarious dislike between Holmes and Watson at first, but very rapidly
I grew to like both.
The biggest -- and indeed most viable -- harp I have
with this film is its pointless attempts to turn
Holmes into a philanderer. Although writers have
taken great pains to reproduce some of the novel's
more eccentric habits in the young sleuth (his
smoking habits, the deerstalker, his excellent
swordplay skills, and his remarkable intelligence,
along with his overly dramatic ego) they've
completely overlooked two things of great
importance: Holmes did
not like and most frightfully distrusted
women for their intellect, and he told Watson once
quite plainly that he'd never been in love. Indeed
in some adaptations this can be forgiven, such as in
the case of Young Sherlock Holmes, because
it's handled with as much mature dignity as possible
without ever making him out to be emotionally
distraught. This film could have been more
believable had it included only Holmes' relationship
with Rebecca and kept it to a professional interest
rather than overt attraction. Viewers instead must
furrow their brow in disbelief when an early scene
finds him asleep in bed with a beautiful blonde he
met at an evening gala just minutes before, and
likewise giving in to the temptations of two
flattering women at the flat while intoxicated.
Since this film was made for television they cannot
be explicit, something I was grateful for in the
long run since while this movie has many flaws, it's
also quite enjoyable. Sexuality is alluded to rather
than graphically shown, but we are treated to a
sensual glimpse of a young woman removing her
clothes. What makes this scene so confusing is that
Holmes is intoxicated with absinthe at the time (a
powerful liquor known to create hallucinations) and
it never becomes clear if the woman and her
companion were actually there or just a figment of
his imagination. The camera avoids direct nudity but
we do see her bare back and large amounts of
cleavage. Holmes has a recurring nightmare and in
its first instance wakes up beside a sleeping girl.
After he becomes ill and is recovering from a
cocaine overdose, Rebecca takes care of him. She
crawls in bed beside him and they passionately kiss
before the camera fades out. There's very mild
innuendo on two occasions, and only three
profanities.
What the production lacks by way of explicit
sexuality comes in the form of graphic depictions of
autopsies and drug content, which earned the DVD
release an R-rating. Viewers are treated to the
sound effects of Watson slicing into bodies in the
police morgue (we briefly see him sawing into a
man's skull) and the sight of him removing brains
for further inspection. They are cut apart and
lingered on by the camera as the duo discuss various
possibilities. The inspector whips the sheet off a
subject only to find his brain has been removed
through a hole cut into his head. It's quite
gruesome. A body in the morgue displays a hideous
gash across its neck. Men are shot in a crossfire
and minor characters are killed. More disconcerting
is the aftermath of Holmes being kidnapped and
forced to take heroin. He is tied down and a
hypodermic forced into his arm on numerous
occasions. Rebecca continues to give him lesser
doses as he attempts to come out of it. Flashbacks
show his brother Mycroft (Richard E. Grant) being
given the same dosage, resulting in the loss of his
ability to walk without assistance. Having it so
violently forced on him doesn't provide good
reasoning for why Holmes would seek to take it
occasionally in later life, and the canon writings
never imply that his intelligent brother ever
indulged or is even a cripple.
The very best scenes are involved in either physical
action or verbal intellect. Holmes handles a foil is
beautiful artistry and the final battle in Big Ben,
while being a candid throwback to The Great Mouse
Detective, is quite enjoyable. Arguably the
finest sequence is between Holmes and Mycroft as
they dine and appraise people who are walking past.
Watson's inventions also come in handy, replacing
Holmes' sword stick with a cane that fires a single
bullet. If only Holmes wasn't amoral, Sherlock
would be a fantastic addition to any serious
collection. For now it's worthwhile for older
viewers capable of viewing autopsies without turning
green, but only with remote in hand.
|