|
THE
INTERPRETER
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 4 out of 5 Because
of: language, brief partial nudity, thematic
elements
Rated:
With
political correctness at its peak, it's unusual to see
a film that doesn't immediately assume a completely
one-sided bias. The Interpreter does
cater in the realm of pacifism and democracy
rather than immediate action, but is also a thinking
man's film that can be enjoyed by both sides of the
debate. It is difficult to
follow, but ultimately rewarding for its
audience, bearing us through a labyrinth
of twists and turns that accumulate in a dynamic
conclusion.
When
the discovery of a disabled security scanner at the United Nations
sends the building into emergency lockdown, interpreter Silvia Broome
(Nichole Kidman) is forced to leave a few personal
items behind in the office. Returning to retrieve
them after hours, she overhears plans to assassinate a visiting African
dignitary from the region in which she spent most of
her childhood. Not immediately associating the cryptic
translation with the impending visit of the dictator,
she delays twenty-four hours in notifying the
appropriate authorities. Only when she becomes
convinced someone is stalking her does she give
the information to her boss, who places her under the
investigation of FBI agent Tobin Keller (Sean Penn).
Suffering the recent loss of his wife in an automobile
accident, and newly returned to work, Keller finds it difficult to believe that
Silvia is telling the truth. She "plays with
words" for a living, and shares a different view
of democracy than he does. It may be only a plea for
attention.
His
investigations turn up immense amounts of evidence
against her, drudging up her brother's association
with terrorist groups in Africa, her presence at war
rallies, and the loss of her
parents and younger sister in an incident with a land
mine. Then there's the evil
dictator they are called in to protect. The US government is obligated to follow every
lead, and protect every visiting dignitary, even a man they
despise who has bathed the streets
of his country in blood. Only when an attempt is made
on Sylvia's life does Keller become convinced that
she's telling the truth. The two are
constantly at odds,
but must come together to
prevent international disaster. What results is a
surprisingly well-crafted thriller so intense that you
will be holding your breath. I wasn't expecting much,
but this interesting take on political assassinations
and foreign policies appealed to my interest in world
events as much as it provided quality entertainment.
There
are some political statements made on the side of
pacifism. Silvia holds the view that words speak
louder than action, and gives Keller a magnificent,
flowery speech about talking rather than fighting.
Shortly thereafter she takes
matters into her own hands and intends to resort to
violence. No opposing view is stated, but Keller isn't
a pacifist. I won't insult my audience by comparing this
to recent political views, but for the nitpicker, a
sometimes not so subtle nod toward pacifism is
present, along with praise for the United
Nations. I am extremely devoted to my political views,
but this film never offended me. It presents an alternate
viewpoint, and leaves the audience to form its own
conclusion. It also shows the evil in mankind. I believe that
it's fair enough not to become a political foil in
entertainment. It's also surprisingly decent in content. There is
occasional graphic violence, the worst
being two men gunned down by children in a football
stadium, and a public bus exploding in a terrorist
attack. Men are shot and killed.
Language
consists of a handful of profanities and vulgarities
(most of them are s**t), but there are two abuses
of Jesus and GD. We briefly see Keller guarding
the foreign prime minister in a strip club. Scantily
clad females dance in the background, and a topless
girl (only her back, and skimpy thong are shown) is
ordered to move back from the official. What surprised
me is that it's not as much of a
thriller (although it delivers scares aplenty) as an exploration of grief.
It's nice to see a man mourning the loss of his wife. The only
improvement that could have been made was more
indication of who people were. The film is moving so
fast that if you're not paying close attention, you
will rapidly become lost. It demands a second or third
viewing to sort out all the missing pieces. It has a powerful message
about justice taking precedence over vengeance, and
learning to save your enemies lives in order to free
your soul from becoming consumed with hatred.
|