|
YOU'VE
GOT MAIL
REVIEWED BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our rating: 4 out of 5
Because of: innuendo, mild language
Rated:
There's nothing quite like a romance to brighten any day. When one
comes wrapped in as charming of a package as You've Got Mail,
there's plenty to smile about... if you can overlook its few quips.
In this latest pairing of the notorious Tom Hanks / Meg Ryan duo,
they play opposite ends of the spectrum. Ryan is Kathleen Kelly, a
charming, sweet, open-tempered and generally all-around nice young
woman with a children's bookstore in downtown New York. Hanks plays
her extreme opposite ... the cynical, self-centered, bad-tempered
and often cruel Joe Fox, big business owner. He and his corporation
are about to build a mega-bookstore just down the street from
Kathleen's little shop, thus putting her and all other small
businesses out of business.
Kathleen has a good life; she makes a reasonable amount of money,
loves the people she works with, a solid friendship with an older
mentor, and a bright if sometimes eccentric boyfriend who works for
the local newspaper. Not overly concerned with Fox Books, she
continues pitching sales and restocking shelves as usual, unaware
that her dream job is about to come crashing down around her.
Unknown to Frank, her fiance, she is carrying on a friendship with a
man she ran into in a chat room. The relationship is "safe," since
there are no specifics -- they talk about a variety of
subjects and don't even know one another's name.
Concerned
because she's becoming increasingly interested in her mysterious
correspondent, Kathleen asks her mentor if she shouldn't break it
off. But this single friend is the one friendly face and open heart
she can turn to when her business goes into decline due to the new,
shiny-floored, big-shelved, massive book megaplex that has just
opened around the corner. Her friend tells her to fight to the
death... and so she launches a campaign to drive Joe Fox and his
"cappuccino land" out of existence.
In the meantime, Joe Fox is struggling with his conscience... and
the secret he's hiding from his overpowering, money-grabbing
girlfriend. While it's all-out war with Kathleen Kelly, his personal
life is in turmoil... he's falling in love with someone over the
internet. He doesn't know her name or what she looks like, but she's
the most beautiful woman in spirit that he's ever met. You guessed
it -- over a modem the hearts are thumping, while in real
life the teeth and claws are bared. This is one couple who have no
idea what's in the making.
You've Got Mail is like a perfectly blended cappuccino. The
casting is brilliant, the screenplay inventive and original and
incredibly believable. Placing at odds two people so vastly
different from one another, waging a war simply to keep their place
in the business world, was a stroke of genius on the filmmaker's
part; and Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks are ideal in their respective
roles. The film manages to both entertain and leave the viewer with
a few good thoughts to ponder... namely the effect that attitude has
on everyone around you; as well as the fact that cruelty and revenge
don't make the heart heal; they make it worse.
Unfortunately
many people will say no to this memorable production because of the
few broken chips in the batter. Joe Fox has a live-in girlfriend and
apparently this style of living is nothing new to his family name:
his grandfather has a daughter seven years old; and his father has a
child (and is living) with a woman named Jillian. There are several
remarks to lesbianism and cyber sex, a few innuendos, and a moderate
amount of language. But despite its flaws, the film has a good heart
and that's what will linger after the tape has stopped.
My single concern in the romanticizing of this production lies with
chat rooms and love connections through a modem in general. For
those who realize the danger in having a relationship with someone
"online," You've Got Mail is a fun, funny, and often likable
treat. But teens should take the initiative to bear in mind that
this is, after all, fiction. Truth can often be far more dangerous.
|