|
A
ROOM WITH A VIEW
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: nudity
Rated:
Few
believe the classic film starring Helena Bonham-Carter and Daniel Day
Lewis is in need of updating, but the BBC wanted its own adaptation and so
Andrew Davies has brought us E. M. Forster's classic novel in a new
medium. The result is a decent production with an ending that sent most of
its fans into an uproar.
It
has been a number of years since Lucy Honeychurch (Elaine Cassidy) last
walked the streets of Rome, but now she wanders with a purpose ... and
memories overflowing her thoughts. Prior to the war, she and her aunt
Charlotte (Sophie Thompson) joined a tour group through Italy with the
intention of learning more about the world and being out amidst society.
Most of their companions are mild enough, apart from the adventurous
novelist Miss Lavish (Sinéad Cusack), whose books are filled with
thrilling secret romances and high stakes adventure, but Lucy is
mysteriously drawn to a young man by the name of George Emmerson (Rafe
Spall). Rather quiet and contemplative, he is far different from his
overly opinionated and often shockingly offensive father. Her aunt
disapproves of their interest in one another, and when it comes to a
climax in a stolen kiss, puts her foot down.
Believing
it would be prudent to part from their company, Charlotte and Lucy journey
to meet another set of friends in a different part of the country. The
stiff but gentlemanly attentions of Cecil (Laurence Fox), who wants her
hand in marriage, and the clumsy interferences of Reverend Eager (Timothy
West) manage to assist her in forgetting for a time, but she has not seen
the last of the Emmersons. The result is a fairly decent adaptation by
most accounts of a novel that I have never been particularly fond of. A
Room With a View and its various adaptations have a great many fans,
but for some reason it has never really resonated with me. There is one
lovely thing that sets this apart, and that is that the character of Miss
Lavish provides some much needed comedic humor. I loved her the instant
she barreled into the room and started off on her melodramatic
descriptions of Italian men.
For
the most part, the first three fourths of the film remain faithful to the
original plot but toward the conclusion things happen that never did in
the novel, and the film concludes on an astonishingly melancholy note.
Perhaps this was Andrew Davis' opportunity to set his screenplay apart, or
perhaps it was a colossal misjudgment, but whatever the cause, it
infuriated most of its European viewers, and I suspect will not be any
more well received in the States. The acting was quite good and I
particularly liked Thompson as Charlotte; she's nowhere near as brilliant
as Maggie Smith was in the part, but she is good for a laugh and seems
more insecure and sensible in many respects than her predecessor. The
costuming is quite lovely and the long walks and drives through the
Italian countryside are simply glorious.
However,
if my hopes were that this adaptation could escape the shocking frontal
nudity of the original, I was vastly disappointed. There is a scene midway
through in which several of the men go skinny dipping in a pond, and wind
up chasing one another naked through the woods because one of them has
nipped another's clothes. This merry adventure sends them careening into
the midst of -- yes, you might have guessed it, the women of the
household. I spent most of the scene with one hand up to avoid catching an
eyeful, but from what I grasped, there is still a lot of backside nudity,
and some from the side, along with one or two shots from the front at a
distance. There are also some nude statues in Rome that Lucy examines with
interest, but that almost pales in comparison. There is a scene of
violence in which a man is stabbed to death. Miss Lavish has some very
forward notions and makes several scandalous comments, and Mr. Emmerson is
an open atheist.
A
Room With a View is a film of missed opportunities. It could have
improved upon the material and only succeeded in a mediocre retelling of
it. The offensive frontal nudity and altogether depressing ending make it
inappropriate for children, and older audiences may find themselves more
entertained and uplifted with a viewing of Cranford
instead.
|