Ballet
Shoes (2007)
cast: Emma Watson, Yasmin Paige,
Lucy Boynton, Richard Griffiths, Gemma Jones,
Harriet Walter, Eileen Atkins, Emilia Fox
Our rating:
4 out of 5
Rated: not rated (content equal to
PG)
reviewed by Charity Bishop
I had never heard of author Noel Streatfield until Meg Ryan's character in the
film You've Got Mail mentioned her by name as one of her favorite
children's authors. This recent adaptation by the BBC of her most famous book is
beautiful and simplistic but also contains mildly offensive overtones that
conservative audiences might find overly progressive and distracting.
There is no room in the house for an orphan. Or so Uncle Matthew states
when a young girl is brought to his home under the knowledge that he is
her only living relative, but it's not long before he starts bringing
other orphans home. Sylvia (Fox) paves the way for Pauline, Petrova, and
Posy, all of whom come from vastly different backgrounds and as they
grow older, have varying ambitions. Pauline (Watson) desires to be an
actress but has no notion of how she might get there. Petrova (Paige)
dreams of being an aviator, and redheaded little Posy (Boynton) wants
nothing more than to be a dancer like her mother, who abandoned her in
her infancy to pursue a career upon the stage. Uncle Matthew has been
gone on one of his endless expeditions for twelve years, and finances
have grown tight.
Forced into taking action before they lose the house to bankers, Sylvia
lends out the rooms to different borders. There is the compassionate Mr.
Simpson (Marc Warren), the two literary professors, and the fast-footed
Theo (Lucy Cohu), who finds that all three girls possess natural talent
for dancing and persuades Sylvia to enroll them in Madame Fidolia's
School of Dance. The Madame (Atkins) takes an immediate interest in Posy
and selects her for private training as a ballerina, while Pauline
becomes quite popular on the stage, and Petrova longs to cast her
dancing shoes aside and pursue her dreams. One might suspect that this
film and the book on which it was based would turn out to be preoccupied
with childish problems, but that is certainly not the case. The
financial difficulties the family faces and the fame that accompanies
their successes are certainly adult problems that the girls deal with
through varying amounts of maturity and inexperience.
Pauline changes the most as she learns humility through her mistakes, and
Watson seems almost more at ease in Pauline than she does as Hermione; her
performance is much more relaxed and it was pleasant to see a different side
to her acting abilities. The supporting cast are also quite good and even
memorable, but it was Atkins who really took me by surprise, stepping out of
her customary grandmotherly role to play the impassioned and often eccentric
Madame. Each of the girls are very different from one another and yet love
and care for each other to the point of giving up things for another's
happiness. In that sense there were a lot of valuable lessons involved about
growing up, making personal sacrifices, and learning to become at ease with
who you are. There is very little content; two of the girls share the
bathtub to conserve water, and are seen from the shoulders up. There are a
couple of mild profanities. Polly likes to tease the other girls about
growing out of their gowns "around the bust," and is often told to be quiet
about it.
Unfortunately, there is one minor issue that might frustrate audiences.
In the book, the professors are friends at best and rent separate rooms,
whereas in the film they are clearly depicted as a lesbian couple, with
one feminine half and the other assuming a more masculine apparel
through the use of a spyglass, trousers, and intentionally raspy voice.
This modern take on the relationship was not needed and is not so overt
as to be openly troubling, but does provide an unwanted sense of
uncertainty during their appearance in the film. I felt it was
inappropriate for a film marketed toward children, and yet another
example of how the BBC has been promoting homosexuality heavily of late,
often at the expense of the novel on which their adaptation is based.
|