|
THE
CAT'S MEOW
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 1 out of 5 Because
of: adultery, sensuality, language, violence
Rated:
The
Cat's Meow
is one of the most offensive, boring, insidious,
and worthless pieces of trash I've ever seen. The story is based
on part on a true to life mystery... but I could have written it
better, with a bit more intrigue and pizzazz. As it stands now,
there's very little dialogue other than innuendo and profanity,
and really no plot except for who's sleeping with who. (I can get
that much information glancing at the tabloids while standing in
the checkout line.)
William
Randolph Hearst (Edward Herrmann) has called all of his closest friends (and a few
enemies) together for a birthday bash on board his yacht. Heading
up the party guests is his mistress, Marion Davies (Kirsten Dunst), a motion
picture star half his age. Among the guests are the birthday boy
(his business partner Thomas Ince, played by Cary Elwes), silent movie star Charlie
Chaplin (Eddie Izzard), a nosy reporter, and a number of other fill-ins: old
maids, playboys, and the occasional musician. The weekend is
primarily for fun, but everyone's come with an agenda. What Hearst
is really playing at is finding out if the rumors about Marion's
affair with Chaplin are true. But in
the meantime, everyone else has a card to play, and a toil of
their own. Harper's mistress is tired of being an unknown actress.
Harper himself is looking to sign a mega contract to manage
Marion's motion picture rights.
Charlie wants Marion in his comedy
pictures... and in his bed. Unfortunately, there's a scandal
involved... his romance with a sixteen year old girl on the set of
his last film. Marion is broke, and trying desperately to cling to
Hearst's money. The newspaper reporter is looking for a scoop...
and possibly a gossip column. What
it all boils down to is... murder! Between the glittering jewels
and champagne glasses is a dangerous pit of ravenous wolves just
waiting to tear the flesh of anyone who steps out of line.
The
fact is, there WAS a murder on this particular dinner party in
Hollywood history, and mysteriously, no one has ever revealed what
really happened. This film is based on conjecture, and turns out
rather silly instead. Although plausible, I think the true murder
was by somewhat more sinister means. The
acting is nothing to scoff at, although I had a bit of trouble
accepting Eddie Izzard as the infamous Charlie Chaplin. The
filmmaking is kind of flippant, and if it weren't for the hoards
of innuendo and profane language, you could almost mistake this
for one of those "old pictures." I'll cut through the
beef and get right to the fat: the plot stinks. The characters are
all immoral. The music is lousy.
The language is extremely heavy,
involving repeated use of GD, and abuse of deity. But the
sexual content is really what sinks the ship. There's
a lot of discussion about who's sleeping with who, and who's
visiting who at night. Lots of smooching. We see a very married
Harper visiting his mistress on a regular basis. At one point, she
opens the door nude (all we see is the back of her shoulders) and
invites him in (he's not that impressed). They tangle in the sheets, but he's not into it,
and they wind up just talking. (But then he gets back into it, and
we overhear them moaning from the next room.) A man and woman
fight before it turns romantic and they lay back on a bed,
kissing; her skirt rides up to show some skin. Short skirts and
cleavage. A
game of charades involves a woman touching her self sensuously,
and we briefly see three women snuggling with a man on a bed
(fully dressed).
A man is shot in the back of the head, with some
bloody results. A man shoots seagulls for fun. The guests agree to
cover up a murder. The language involves a mouthed f-word, sexual
slang, 9 abuses of deity coupled with profanity, and 23 religious exclamations
(including abuse of Jesus' name). Guests are shown drinking,
smoking, and taking drugs. My
grandmother was a teen during the roaring twenties. I can guarantee you she didn't act like this party does.
Too bad; the film looked promising and has some really neat
"roaring twenties" outfits. But The Cat's Meow is
nothing to purr at.
|