|
DANCES
WITH WOLVES
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: political correctness, violence, nudity,
sexual content
Rated:
Twelve
years ago the ever-politically correct film Dances With Wolves
swept the Oscars, thumbed its nose at historians, and became a
classic merely for its sense of arousing "white guilt"
in our bad treatment of the American Indians. If you can overlook
the gross historical inaccuracies and content issues, you could
enjoy the story for its own merit... but that's hard to do.
Jon
Dunbar (Kevin Cosner) is a lieutenant of the Civil War who has just barely
resisted going "under the knife" for a foot infected
with gangrene. Limping out of the tent when the doctor's back is
turned and stealing a horse, he rides away, determining to kill
himself by riding full-force in front of the enemy encampment. But
instead of being killed, he is hailed as a hero, since he draws
enemy attention and firepower and allows his men to take the
opposing force by surprise. In
thankfulness, the doctors are ordered to do everything they can to
save his life... and his leg. But what's more, he's asked where he
would like to be posted next. Desiring to see the prairie
"before it's gone," he asks to be sent to the Dakotas.
But there's something strange about his post... his guide and the
fort commander are odd people, secretive and unwilling to divulge
anything, and his commanding officer kills himself after sending
Dunbar off on his assignment. Since he was the single figure of
authority who knew of Dunbar's destination, the man is
"lost" in military records... and no one is sent to join
him at the lonely prairie fort.
His
one companion is a beautiful gray wolf whom he slowly befriends...
but the prairie is a dangerous and deadly place to live,
particularly alone. There are the hair-raising Pawnee, who
brutalize and scalp pioneers for kicks, the pack of wolves that
run the wild, even buffalo who stop for nothing and no one in
their way. But soon everything changes when he's introduced to a
Sioux Indian tribe... one day while walking, he comes across a
young white woman (Mary McDonnell) raised by Indians who is cutting her wrists in a
show of mourning for her newly departed husband. In stopping her
suicide, he is brought into the tribe.
From
here on in, it takes a less passive turn and strays into political
correct themes. White men are the enemy, since it fights the
Indians, forces them off their lands, hunts their buffalo merely
for the pelts, and abuses animals. Indian women, according to the
film, are amazingly respected and liberated, cared for by gentle,
compassionate husbands. Outspoken and actually listened to, they
have quite a voice at the tribal meetings. Uh-huh. I never heard
that in history class. They also conveniently forgot to mention,
as the Indians are mourning the loss of a herd of buffalo, that
the natives often drove entire herds over cliffs just to get meat
from a few. What's
even more amusing... an Indian witch doctor that actually
encourages Dunbar to wait in having children, as if they have
control over the situation! That's what women were for in the
Indian tribes... bearing children! They were also notorious for
selling their women in trade for other things... particularly
horses. Pardon me, but the "white man" brought to the
natives many modern conveniences and the religious concept of
compassion. In truth, yes, our white ancestors did treat the
Indians unjustly, but we must not forget what the Indians did to
many settlers. It was a give and take game of bloody violence and
long-reaching greed that both parties were responsible for.
Preachiness
aside, Dances With Wolves is a very brutal and violent
film. We see the scalped bodies of settlers along the trail, as
well as some actual scalpings (only partially seen) by Pawnee
warriors. The skinned bodies of a buffalo herd are left to bake in
the sun; the Indians chase down and kill other animals for food.
The battle scenes are graphic, filled with flying arrows and
bloody gunfire. A war hospital is strewn with bloodied figures,
many of which who are in the process of having body parts
amputated. The film, in its extended "director's cut" is
over three hours in length; an hour and a half of actual dialogue
and development... the rest is violence.
There's
also a disturbing amount of language, nudity, and sex, and quite
frankly I don't know where the dividing line between a PG13 and an
R rating would be. God's name is profaned often, along with other
mind profanities that litter the English part of the film. (The
rest is filmed in the actual original languages, and read in
subtitles.) We see brief backside nudity as Dunbar skinny-dips in
the pond and is taken by surprise by intruders; he dashes
screaming up the bank. There are two scenes of intimacy, one
between the chief Indian and his wife and a later, a more graphic
love scene between Dunbar and the woman he saved. It
moves very slowly with long spaces of time in which nothing
happens... we watch Dunbar walk around on the prairie, toss meat
scraps to the wolf, and repair his house. Yes, it's beautifully
filmed and deserves a handful of the Oscars that it received for
excellence, but the truth is Dances With Wolves does more
to convince us that the Indians weren't actual savages than
entertains.
|