Frankenstein:
The True Story (1973)
Our rating: 2 out of 5
Rated: PG13
reviewed by:
Charity Bishop
I have been curious about this film for quite some time since it contains one of
Jane Seymour's earliest performances. It was recently released on DVD in a
much-debated "unedited" version. I am told Europe has the actual full-length
release, while Americans must settle for a slightly more sanitized version.
Which leads me to wonder, if this is sanitized... what must the original be
like?
The ambitious and moralistic Dr. Frankenstein (Leonard Whiting) hopes to
do no more in the medical profession than to assist in saving people's
lives, but upon his first night in the institution he makes the
acquaintance of the obsessive Dr. Clerval (David McCallum). After making
off with a severed limb from an amputee victim, Clerval reveals to
Frankenstein that he is fascinated with the concept of manufacturing
life. He has built a miniscule machine capable of bringing various dead
creatures to life, and intends to magnify it ten thousand fold in order
to make a human .... a human of such glorious perfection that everyone
will be in awe of his beauty, intellect, and charm. Frankenstein
unwittingly becomes lured into this fascination, which leads him to
neglect his family and friends back home, most particularly the lovely
Elizabeth (Nicola Pagett).
When a terrible accident accumulates in Dr. Clerval's untimely death,
Frankenstein uses his brain to breathe his creation to life. The
Creature (Michael Sarrazin) is polished and affectionate, eager to learn
and forms a magnificent impression in society. He is fawned over and
loved wherever he goes, believed to be an exotic count from a foreign
land. All is well for a good long time until the experiment begins to go
array. It appears that the beauty of the creature can only last for so
long before the body begins to decompose, transforming him into a
tormented and hideous monster whose desire to be loved leads him to do
dark and terrible things. Frankenstein is haunted by what he has done,
but is even more distraught when his assistance is required by another
scientist (James Mason) to create a female creature who will not
decompose. Prima (Jane Seymour) is one of the most ravishing women on
the face of the earth, but also one of the most cold.
As you can see, the storyline does not represent the original novel in
any form. It's gem is Seymour, who is at her most young and
consequently, her most beautiful. There's a striking appeal in her
astounding beauty when you contrast it with the diabolical nature of her
character, who is evil to her very core. Whether it's mocking the lady
of the house or teasing a cat, she's one of the scariest females I have
ever seen on screen. The other acting involved is excellent as well, but
the biggest shout out is deserved by Mason (his torment in one of his
final scenes is gripping) and Sarrazin. When he discovers what he looks
like in a broken mirror fragment, the audience's heart breaks along with
him. All things considered, it is a strong film because it does have a
decent plot, but it seems to lag a bit and might have been altogether
better with more of a focus on Prima than Frankenstein. In fact, I found
the first hour or so excruciatingly dull -- severed arms and all.
Much has been made of how gruesome this adaptation is, and for a
television drama from the 1970's, it is pretty gross at times. There is
a good deal of blood and numerous severed body parts -- either crawling
across the floor or floating around in colored liquid (including a head
or two). The most gruesome scene is one in which it's implied a head is
torn off. (Apparently, in the European version we get a glimpse of this,
but in the American release we only hear the screams and see the head
rolling away on the floor.) What bothered me more was the naked female
body floating in a tank of water in the background of a significant
amount of scenes. Scenes involving this nude corpse seem to go on
forever. Beside that, there's little sexual content. Prima and
Frankenstein do kiss passionately after he's married, but are
interrupted before anything more can happen. Prima squeezes a cat by the
throat when he displeases her, but the pet escapes unharmed.
The production design is very good for such an early miniseries, and it
does leave the audience numerous things to ponder, among them the worth
of the human soul, and what prompts evil among men, but it seemed to
fall a bit flat for me. In truth, I have never found a Frankenstein
that I liked. Maybe because at some point, all of the films fail to be
both fascinating and true to the book.
|