|
MADAME
BOVARY
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: graphic sexual content, adultery, nudity
Rated:
Editor's
Note: this production contains graphic sexual
content. This review is not recommended for younger or
sensitive readers.
Gustave Flaubert's
novel created quite a controversy in Victorian England
upon its publication. It was accused of offending
modern sensibilities about morality due to its unashamedly
adulterous heroine. Time has desensitized audiences
toward acceptance of adultery, however wrong, but even
the most intrepid viewer cannot fail to be horrified
by the graphic depictions of her adulterous liaisons.
After the tragic death of her mother, Emma (Frances O'Connor)
desires to leave the nunnery and return to her
father's house in the French countryside. Discontent
and "empty" since the event, her interest is
peaked by the local physician, come to tend her
father's misfortune in falling from a tree and badly
injuring his leg. Charles Bovary (Hugh Bonneville) is
nursing a broken heart after the death of his wife,
and finds solace in Emma's notions of life. The
two are soon married, and Emma realizes that the
passionate love life she anticipated through reading
novels is sadly erroneous. Her husband is unsatisfying
and her life unhappy beneath the domineering control
of her mother in law, Marie Louise (Eileen Atkins).
Knowing his wife will not be happy until they move
into town, Bovary does so, introducing her into good
society and igniting a dangerous flame in her
friendship with the impressionable young artist, Leon
(Hugh Dancy). The birth of her first child places an
emotional distance between them that makes her vulnerable
to the advances of a notorious seducer, Rodolphe (Greg
Wise). Making her acquaintance quite by chance in the
illness of his traveling companion, he persists in
being allowed to visit her, taking her on long rides
into the woods and immediately having his way. Concealing
the affair from her unassuming husband, Emma's
affections increase to the point of desiring to run
away with her lover. The consequences will be
devastating. Though the production is beautifully
filmed and has lovely casting, it seems laborious at
times. There is radiance in the costuming and the
novel is well expressed, however the primary fault
lies in the decision of filmmakers not to covertly
imply Emma's indiscretions, but to reveal them to us
in all their hot, lurid sexual perversion. There's no
delicate way in which to say this, but the audience is
given a glimpse of a contrast between lovers; the
mechanical, emotionless and downright repulsive act
with her husband, and an impassioned, raw, even
violent tryst with Rodolphe in the woods. There are
four graphic and uncomfortably long love scenes, all
with movement and two of them involving partial nudity
on both parties, numerous instances of kissing and
caressing in bed, indications of manual stimulation,
and daydreams in which the heroine imagines herself
kissing one of her lovers. Though not overtly sexual,
Bovary does a medical examination to determine if
she's pregnant. There's also some gore in the medical
letting of blood, a festered open wound, a badly
mangled club's foot, and vomiting after a character
consumes poison.
Beyond
the obvious sexual issues the film presents lies a
much more dangerous premise. First it asks us to
believe that Emma is in "love" with her
lovers, when the reality is that she is lusting after
them. She has chosen to be unfulfilled by her husband
sexually, and builds up notions of what it must be
like through tawdry romance novels. That anyone could
believe a relationship based on lust is long-lasting
or emotionally fulfilling is preposterous. We do see
the effects of this affair begin to fade with time (as
the "candle starts to burn out"), and her
move on to new prey, but the film is not satisfying to
anyone with the truth: that Emma's emptiness is the
absence of God in her soul, that she has made her life
miserable through her choices, and that her husband is
not stupid or horrible, and therefore audiences cannot
seek to justify her love affairs because of him. Adultery
is no matter to scoff at, but deeply wounding to both
individuals involved, particularly the betrayed party.
What we have here is a depiction of man's most primal
urges that reinforce the notion that sex is base
instinct that cannot be controlled. I was left with a
feeling of deep disappointment over Emma's choices,
anger that she would betray her husband so shamelessly
(she confesses that she has no guilt over the affair),
and overall repugnance for God's gift for a married
couple. What feeble religion is involved is
downplayed, mocked (Madame Bovary meets most of her
lovers in the church, sits piously reading her Bible,
and declares flippantly that she chose not to be a nun
because Jesus would be a poor bridegroom) and ignored.
You are much better off with more heartening, innocent
costume dramas such as Daniel
Deronda, where the woman has good cause to
betray her husband and yet chooses not to.
|