The
Phantom of the Opera (1983)
Our rating: 4 out of 5
Rated: PG
reviewed by Charity Bishop
The tragic tale of Erik has captivated the hearts of many generations
since its first penning by French author Gaston Lourex. It has been
transformed into various film adaptations and won worldwide acclaim
through its London and Broadway performances under the guiding hand of
talented composer Andrew Lloyd Webber. This adaptation, while
imaginative and enjoyable, holds only a vague resemblance to the
original tale.
The story opens in the Paris Opera House where the director Gerard (Burt
Landcaster) has just been replaced by two new managers, Cholet (Ian
Richardson) and his abominable wife Carlotta (Andra Ferrol). He warns them
the Opera is not friendly to those who impose its lower levels, but Cholet
still sends a man below to discern what set pieces and props they've
accumulated over the years. Joseph Buguet never returns. Prompted by the
promise of music lessons by the charming Count de Chagny, Christine Daae
(Teri Polo) has come to Paris to learn how to sing. Her voice is beautiful
but unpolished and Carlotta puts her to work as a costume girl. Toiling
behind the scenes and living in the lower levels of the Opera House,
Christine comes to meet the mysterious masked figure who calls himself
merely "Maestro." Under his quiet tutelage her talent begins to grow. Cholet
and his wife are learning what happens when you affront the "opera ghost."
Performances go badly. Carlotta's wig is drenched in itching powder during a
bold performance of Faust. The body of Joseph Buguet appears and
disappears. The police are too terrified to delve into the lower levels and
the only one who knows the true identity of this mysterious "fiend" is
Gerard. The same monster terrorizing the new owners, demanding Box 5 be kept
open for his pleasure at every performance, an playing rounds of pranks on
Carlotta is Christine's music instructor (Charles Dance).
Erik is the facially deformed self-professed "madman" who lives in the
Paris underground. His greatest desire is to be left alone by the
outside world, who would only hate and revile him for his face rather
than the worth of his musical talent. More than anything he wants to see
Christine triumph, little knowing the powers above will use this
obsession to fuel rage against him, leading to an impressive and
devastating show of violence. Christine must also choose between two
passions... the terrifying "angel of music" who so painstakingly trains
her to perfection, or the handsome Philippe de Chagny (Adam Storke). The
tale unfolds in the midst of visual splendor, creating a labyrinth of
the Paris Opera House and its many moving panels, passages, and
corridors. The film is very visually appealing and soars to the heights
of imagination, transforming from a fairy tale like atmosphere into one
of grim horror.
Charles Dance first wins your heart and then breaks it, as Erik was meant
to. Teri Polo was the very core of the film; her Christine is innocent,
naive, trusting, but also ultimately aware of her own peril. One of her
finest scenes is when she asks to see beneath the mask. Promising she'll
gaze on it in love, she is instead taken with horror and faints... to Erik's
ultimate desolation. The acting ranges from being wooden to breathtaking, as
though the director was uncertain of his players. The first twenty minutes
are all very stringent and Erik comes across as much more mild-mannered than
the actual tale implies. It's difficult to see him go from the caring,
gentle would-be-lover to a violent madman, but somehow Dance manages to pull
it off. The real gem here is Ian Richardson, who takes his humor and
irony-laced part and gives it life. The film is much funnier than you might
expect, since Erik has a morbid sense of humor much of the Company has
learned to adapt to. The scene where he quietly enters Carlotta's dressing
room and proceeds to dump a suitcase full of rats on her for sabotaging
Christine is priceless.
With the lack of full-blown musical numbers, the film relieves the
audience... it doesn't require detaching yourself completely from ALW's
version, even though the two collide plot-wise. As a fan of the
original, I didn't understand the motivation in changing portions of the
story, particularly concerning Erik's past, his mother, and the count's
name. (You cannot have PotO without Raoul!) The changes are forgivable
but also slightly irritating. With them come the film's few content
concerns. By in large the tale is decent -- Erik never had any malicious
intentions toward Christine and didn't take advantage of her when he had
the opportunity. Philippe is portrayed as something of a playboy but we
only see the girls giggling and flirting with him. Carlotta in
particular shows enormous amounts of cleavage, and several times young
ladies are seen getting dressed (putting on garments over their
corsets). A woman's back is seen from behind as she puts on a corset and
laces it up after a romantic fling with a boy in the woods.
Dialogue recaps a romantic intrigue, the result being Erik. It's revealed
the man was married at the time but deceived his lover. A woman tries to
consume gypsy medicine in order to either kill herself or abort the baby
(it's unclear) but a man breaks the vial. Joseph Buguet falls through the
slats in the floor, resulting in his death. Another man is found hanging
from the rafters in the basement; the policeman investigating is impaled by
a falling piece of machinery. Infuriated over an audience's negative
response to Christine, Erik slices the ropes holding aloft the Opera House's
magnificent chandelier. It plunges to the ground floor, resulting in the
deaths of several people and the harming of others. (They're seen being
carried out on stretchers.) Christine discovers a headless doll in a cradle,
then the severed head hanging upside-down and mutilated near a portrait.
(This is never fully explained.) A man is shot and killed. We never see
Erik's face, even in flashbacks as a child. But we don't need to -- the lack
of knowing makes Christine's response all the more horrifying. The movie
does well playing with your emotions, making you laugh, scheme, gasp, and
even cry. The length does seem to drag on in places, but makes up for it
with the concluding scenes. If you're not a true Puritan -- and even if you
are -- you'll find something hauntingly enjoyable and tragic in the tale
surrounding The Phantom of the Opera.
|