|
ROB
ROY
REVIEWED
BY CHARITY BISHOP
Our
rating: 2 out of 5 Because
of: graphic sexuality, brutal depiction of rape
Rated:
Editor's
Note: this review references the vulgar sexual
content of the film and is not recommended for
sensitive readers.
One
of my friends warned me never to rent Rob Roy.
By the conclusion of the film, I was wishing I had
listened to her.
The
Scottish Highlands are ruled over by a succession of
wealthy European monarchs, marquises and barons from
England. The local landowner's cattle have been
thieved and a gathering of his tenants, lead by the
legendary Robert McGregor (Liam Neeson), nicknamed
"Rob Roy" among his friends, have set out to
reclaim them. Killing the ringleader of the rustlers
but allowing the rest to go free with a warning, he
returns the property to a grateful marquis. His wife
Mary (Jessica Lange) welcomes him home, grateful that
he has returned unscathed. The Marquis (John Hurt) has
brought a new fighter in among his consort, a
womanizing, foppish swordsman by the name of Archibald Cunningham
(Tim Roth) who is financially impaired and content to
play the master's fool, while bedding his kitchen
maids. Believing
that cattle are the way of the future, Rob decides to
make an investment. An agreement is made with the
marquis as to the lending of a thousand pounds, to be
paid off with interest. The McGregor property is put
up as collateral, with the entire village hoping to
benefit from the proceeds. This garners the interest
of the marquis' greedy and scurrilous attorney, Killearn
(Brian Cox), who persuades Cunningham to help him
thieve the money. Tracking down and murdering the
trusted courier in cold blood, the two men allow Rob
to bear the brunt of punishment. Believing that the
courier has run off to the Americas with his fortune,
the marquis demands to be repaid. When Rob refuses his
attempts at blackmail to incriminate another local
baronet in treachery against the king, he must turn
rogue to avoid being hunted down like a dog.
Cunningham
is unleashed upon the countryside, free to brutalize
the men of the village, rape their women, and burn
local properties. The consequences of these actions
will have a mighty backlash among the innocents drawn
between two equally powerful and determined men. While
Rob Roy is done with masterful storytelling and
has a compelling conclusion, I found it to be far too
disconcerting to be considered quality entertainment.
The costuming and casting is perfect, and all the
actors are absolutely remarkable in their roles. Tim
Roth plays a notoriously unscrupulous villain, cold
and calculating, downright cruel to those who fall
beneath his command, who is strangely empathetic
toward the beginning. Liam Neeson is an excellent
offset to his sneering charm, maintaining dignity
despite his hardships. Minor characters were well
chosen, and the dialogue they delivers has a degree of
authenticity. However,
I question why it had to be so sexually oriented. The
film is inundated with such vile depictions of
perversion that I cannot tell you the worst of it,
except there is more than one instance of a hand going
up a skirt (in one instance, she is unwilling but
forced), numerous blunt conversations about sexual
acts, partial nudity, and two scenes of graphic
lovemaking between a man and wife (fully clothed). In
the film's most disturbing scene, Mary is bent over a
table and raped by Cunningham. The scene is extremely
long and brutal, and is referenced numerous times
through coarse innuendo, Cunningham taunting her
husband, and the discovery of her pregnancy. I had
never seen anything so horrible. There is language
(mostly Scottish slang), and gory violence. Men are
shot and stabbed, with gruesome results. Primitive
abortion is referenced twice. Mary confesses that she
cannot kill the baby, and Cunningham tells his
mistress to terminate her pregnancy.
Family
plays an important role in the tale and the issue of
honor is upheld. Rob Roy sacrifices everything so that
he will not "bear false witness" against an
innocent man. He looks after the men of the village
and acts in the interest of justice more than revenge.
He is willing to accept Cunningham's child into the
love of their home. But these feeble virtues were
overshadowed in a gross depiction of perverse
sexuality. It seemed as though it was a constant
topic. I did not object to the central pivot of the
plot as much as how they were depicted, with entirely
too much realism. Any woman would find this impossible
to watch, and any man would be equally disgusted.
©
www.charitysplace.com
- all rights reserved.
|