Rob
Roy
Our rating: 2 out of 5
Rated: R
reviewed by Charity Bishop
One of my friends warned me never to rent Rob Roy. By the conclusion of
the film, I was wishing I had listened to her.
The Scottish Highlands are ruled over by a succession of wealthy European
monarchs, marquises and barons from England. The local landowner's cattle have
been thieved and a gathering of his tenants, lead by the legendary Robert
McGregor (Liam Neeson), nicknamed "Rob Roy" among his friends, have set out to
reclaim them. Killing the ringleader of the rustlers but allowing the rest to go
free with a warning, he returns the property to a grateful marquis. His wife
Mary (Jessica Lange) welcomes him home, grateful that he has returned unscathed.
The Marquis (John Hurt) has brought a new fighter in among his consort, a
womanizing, foppish swordsman by the name of Archibald Cunningham (Tim Roth) who
is financially impaired and content to play the master's fool, while bedding his
kitchen maids.
Believing that cattle are the way of the future, Rob decides to make an
investment. An agreement is made with the marquis as to the lending of a
thousand pounds, to be paid off with interest. The McGregor property is put up
as collateral, with the entire village hoping to benefit from the proceeds. This
garners the interest of the marquis' greedy and scurrilous attorney, Killearn
(Brian Cox), who persuades Cunningham to help him thieve the money. Tracking
down and murdering the trusted courier in cold blood, the two men allow Rob to
bear the brunt of punishment. Believing that the courier has run off to the
Americas with his fortune, the marquis demands to be repaid. When Rob refuses
his attempts at blackmail to incriminate another local baronet in treachery
against the king, he must turn rogue to avoid being hunted down like a dog.
Cunningham is unleashed upon the countryside, free to brutalize the men of the
village, rape their women, and burn local properties.
The consequences of these actions will have a mighty backlash among the
innocents drawn between two equally powerful and determined men. While
Rob Roy is done with masterful storytelling and
has a compelling conclusion, I found it to be far too disconcerting to be
considered quality entertainment. The costuming and casting is perfect, and all
the actors are absolutely remarkable in their roles. Tim Roth plays a
notoriously unscrupulous villain, cold and calculating, downright cruel to those
who fall beneath his command, who is strangely empathetic toward the beginning.
Liam Neeson is an excellent offset to his sneering charm, maintaining dignity
despite his hardships. Minor characters were well chosen, and the dialogue they
delivers has a degree of authenticity. However, I question why it had to be so
sexually oriented. The film is inundated with such vile depictions of perversion
that I cannot tell you the worst of it, except there is more than one instance
of a hand going up a skirt (in one instance, she is unwilling but forced),
numerous blunt conversations about sexual acts, partial nudity, and two scenes
of graphic lovemaking between a man and wife (fully clothed). In the film's most
disturbing scene, Mary is bent over a table and raped by Cunningham. The scene
is extremely long and brutal, and is referenced numerous times through coarse
innuendo, Cunningham taunting her husband, and the discovery of her pregnancy. I
had never seen anything so horrible. There is language (mostly Scottish slang),
and gory violence. Men are shot and stabbed, with gruesome results. Primitive
abortion is referenced twice. Mary confesses that she cannot kill the baby, and
Cunningham tells his mistress to terminate her pregnancy.
Family plays an important role in the tale and the issue of honor is upheld. Rob
Roy sacrifices everything so that he will not "bear false witness" against an
innocent man. He looks after the men of the village and acts in the interest of
justice more than revenge. He is willing to accept Cunningham's child into the
love of their home. But these feeble virtues were overshadowed in a gross
depiction of perverse sexuality. It seemed as though it was a constant topic. I
did not object to the central pivot of the plot as much as how they were
depicted, with entirely too much realism. Any woman would find this impossible
to watch, and any man should be equally disgusted.
|